Miller v. Miller, 74-1955
| Decision Date | 15 October 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 74-1955,74-1955 |
| Citation | 504 F.2d 1067 |
| Parties | Melvin MILLER, Appellant, v. Don MILLER, Individually and as Administrator of the Children's Services Division of the State of Oregon, et al., Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Paul R. Meyer (argued), of Kobin & Meyer, Portland, Ore., for appellant.
W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor Gen. (argued), for appellees.
Before ELY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, * District judge.
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
This appeal challenges the validity of an Oregon statute, ORS 109.326(1). In effect, the statute permits the adoption of a child born out of wedlock upon the consent of the natural mother, without notice to, or the consent of, the natural father.
It is undisputed that the appellant is the natural father of a child born out of wedlock in July 1972. Following the child's birth, both parents shared custody of the child for a brief period. In late 1973, however, the mother, then in sole custody, consented to the adoption of the child without in any way consulting or attempting to secure the cooperation or consent of the natural father. The adoption has not yet been formally completed, and certain state action in connection with such a proposed adoption is required. The natural father sued in the District Court, resting his claim for the District Court's jurisdiction on 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 28 U.S.C. 1343. He attacked the constitutionality of the Oregon statute which, in situations such as that involved in the attempted adoption in question, provides, inter alia, that 'the father of the child shall be disregarded just as if he were dead . . ..' Denied relief in the District Court, the appellant filed his appeal.
At the oral argument of the cause in this court, conducted on October 8, 1974, the Solicitor General of the State of Oregon conceded, in effect, that the state statute in question was out of harmony with the Federal Constitution. Pursuant to that concession, and upon the authority of Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 92 S.Ct. 1208, 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972), and Bailey v. Patterson, 369 U.S. 31, 82 S.Ct. 549, 7 L.Ed.2d 512 (1962), it is hereby adjudged and declared that the application of the statute in question would infringe upon the Federal constitutional rights of the appellant and all natural fathers similarly situated. We further declare that the said statute is constitutionally null and void and, hence, unenforceable. From the attitude and forthrightness of the Oregon Solicitor General who appeared before us, we have no reason to believe that Oregon, following our...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Fiallo v. Levi
...ties of affection to their illegitimate children and desire a continuing relationship with them. See, e. g., Miller v. Miller, 504 F.2d 1067 (9th Cir. 1974) (per curiam) (statute permitting adoption without notice to natural father of illegitimate unconstitutional); People ex rel. Slawek v.......
-
Adoption of B., Matter of
...808 (J.D.R.Ct.1971) (visitation); E. v. T., 124 N.J.Super. 535, 308 A.2d 41 (Ch.Div.1973) (custody). See also, Miller v. Miller, 504 F.2d 1067 (9 Cir. 1974) (per curiam ) (statute permitting adoption without notice to natural father of illegitimate, unconstitutional); People ex rel. Slawek ......
-
Quilloin v. Walcott, 31643
...(1972), interpreted Stanley as having recognized that unwed fathers have protectable rights in their children. See also Miller v. Miller, 504 F.2d 1067 (9th Cir., 1974); Willmot v. Decker, 541 P.2d 13 (Haw., 1975); Forestiere v. Doyle, 30 Conn.Sup. 284, 310 A.2d 607 (1973); State ex rel. Le......
-
Adoption of Baby Girl, Matter of
...where a statute is declared unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court it simply ceases to exist in a legal sense. Miller v. Miller, 504 F.2d 1067 (9th Cir.); see Minnesota Sugar Co. v. Iverson, 91 Minn. 30, 97 N.W. 454 (1903). Thus, section 111 of the Domestic Relations Law has no......
-
Cases in Controversy
...extend to the father of an illegitimate child. Id. at 1 374-75; see Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651 (1972); Miller v. Miller, 504 F.2d 1067, 1075 (9th Cir. 1974). In Wells v. Children's Aid Society of Utah, 681 P.2d 199 (Utah 1984), the Utah Supreme Court held that although parental ......