Miller v. Poe

Citation293 F. 766
Decision Date06 November 1923
Docket Number2098.
PartiesThomas W. MILLER, Alien Property Custodian, et al. v. Edwin W. POE et al.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; John C. Rose, Judge.

Hartwell Cabell, of New York City, R. E. Lee Marshall, of Baltimore, Md., and Daniel O. Hastings, of Wilmington, Del., for appellants.

Stuart S. Janney and Joseph C. France, both of Baltimore, Md. (J. Kemp Bartlett, of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellees.

Before WOODS and WADDILL, Circuit Judges, and McDOWELL, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The decree in this cause is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinions of the District Judge. 276 F. 949; 293 F. 764.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Hicks v. Poe
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 16 de novembro de 1925
    ...a decree for the receivers for $189,517.16 with interest. 276 F. 949; 293 F. 764. The Court of Appeals affirmed it without opinion. Miller v. Poe, 293 F. 766. The appeal to this court, allowed January 7, 1924, was taken as of right under section 241 of the Judicial Code (Comp. St. § 1218). ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT