Miller v. Southland Life Ins. Co., 2929.
Decision Date | 18 January 1934 |
Docket Number | No. 2929.,2929. |
Citation | 68 S.W.2d 558 |
Parties | MILLER et al. v. SOUTHLAND LIFE INS. CO. et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Henderson County; Ben F. Dent, Judge.
Suit by Ambrosia Miller and husband against the Southland Life Insurance Company and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.
Affirmed in part and in part reversed and remanded.
This is a suit by Ambrosia Miller and husband, P. E. Miller, against the Southland Life Insurance Company and M. K. Miller, to recover a parcel of land in Athens, Tex., a part of large lot No. 4, described by metes and bounds as follows:
It was alleged that a portion of the land had been the residence of plaintiffs since January 1, 1900, and the balance was business homestead. That portion asserted to be the residence homestead begins "at a point on the West boundary line of said Large Lot No. 4, and the South Boundary Line of said T & N O R R Right of way, and running thence in an Easterly direction with said right of way to the East boundary line of said Large Lot No. 4, thence South 60 feet; thence in a Westerly direction parallel with the South boundary line of said Railway right of way to the West boundary line of said Large Lot No. 4; thence North with said West boundary line 60 feet to the place of beginning."
The defendant M. K. Miller, who is the son of plaintiffs, claims the land in controversy as the owner thereof.
The insurance company has a deed of trust lien upon the property dated September 25, 1928, executed by M. K. Miller and wife.
A peremptory charge in favor of the insurance company was given and verdict returned in accordance therewith.
As between the plaintiffs and M. K. Miller, the case was submitted upon special issues.
The first question submitted was whether the plaintiffs had abandoned the property as a homestead at the time it was conveyed to M. K. Miller.
Conditional upon a negative answer to the first question additional questions were submitted upon the issue of limitations and improvements by M. K. Miller.
The first question having been answered in the affirmative the other questions were not answered.
Upon the verdict and finding stated, judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants.
On January 1, 1900, the record title was in P. E. Miller. The property was community.
By general warranty deed dated July 13, 1920, recorded December 28, 1920, P. E. Miller conveyed to the Athens Pottery Company, an unincorporated joint stock association. The field notes read:
By deed of April 6, 1923, recorded October 24, 1923, P. E. Miller, J. E. Miller, and Paul Hable, as trustee of said association, conveyed by the same description to the Athens Pottery Company, a corporation.
By resolution of November 28, 1927, acknowledged and recorded December 14, 1927, the president of said corporation was authorized to sell to M. K. Miller the plant of said corporation. The plant referred to was situate upon the land in controversy.
Pursuant to such resolution, said corporation by its president, P. E. Miller, by deed dated November 28, 1927, recorded December 14, 1927, conveyed to M. K. Miller by description the same as in foregoing deeds.
By deed dated September 25, 1928, recorded September 26, 1928, M. K. Miller conveyed by same description to H. B. Seay, in trust, to secure payment of certain notes of the grantor in favor of the Southland Life Insurance Company.
The minutes of a meeting of the board of directors of the Athens Pottery Company corporation, held June 12, 1926, read:
By unrecorded deed dated September 18, 1925, acknowledged June 12, 1926, the Athens Pottery Company, Inc., by P. E. Miller, president, conveyed to P. E. Miller that part of large lot 4, described as follows:
This deed recites that it was in consideration of $10 and the execution by the grantee to the grantor of a deed to that part of lot 4, described as follows:
This deed was attested by M. K. Miller as director and treasurer.
By unrecorded deed dated June 12, 1926, P. E. Miller conveyed to the Athens Pottery Company, Inc., that part of lot 4 described as follows:
This deed recites that it was in consideration of $10 and the grantee executing a deed to P. E. Miller of a part of lot described as follows:
Bishop & Holland, of Athens, for appellants.
Seay, Malone & Lipscomb, of Dallas, and Wynne & Wynne, of Athens, for appellees.
The question which first arises in this case is one of boundary. It arises out of the fact that the west line of the land in controversy measured from the southwest corner of lot 4 north to the Texas & New Orleans right of way is 288 feet in length, whereas the distance call of the west line of the tract conveyed by P. E. Miller by deed dated June 13, 1920, is 228 feet.
In this connection appellees...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Champion Papers, Inc.
... ... Co. west of the east forth of ... 22, 161 S.W.2d 783 (Tex.Com.App.1942); Miller v. Southland Life Ins. Co., 68 S. W.2d 558 ... ...
-
Thomas Jordan, Inc. v. Skelly Oil Co.
...defeat that intention is rejected as false regardless of the comparative dignity of the conflicting calls.' Miller v. Southland Life Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 68 S.W.2d 558, 560; Tex. Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. Crabb, (Tex.) Com.App., 249 S.W. It is also a well-settled rule of construction in ......
-
Cooper Co. v. Warwick, 1869.
...587, par. 3, and authorities there cited; Schulz v. L. E. Whitham & Co., 119 Tex. 211, 27 S.W.2d 1093, par. 1; Miller v. Southland Life Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 68 S.W.2d 558, 562, par. 7, and authorities there cited; Sanders v. Life Insurance Co., Tex.Civ.App., 57 S.W.2d 327, pars. 1 and 2;......
-
Lincoln v. Bennett
...and questioning the validity of the lien held by Bennett. Martin v. Astin, Tex.Com.App., 295 S.W. 584, 585; Miller v. Southland Life Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 68 S.W.2d 558; Bell v. Schwarz, 56 Tex. 353; McLaren v. Jones, 89 Tex. 131, 33 S.W. 849; Parker et al. v. Schrimsher, Tex.Civ.App., 17......