Miller v. Young
| Docket Number | 28287 |
| Decision Date | 18 April 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
State v. Uhre
...at trial; (5) a deprivation of the right to a public trial; and (6) an erroneous reasonable doubt standard." Miller v. Young , 2018 S.D. 33, ¶ 14, 911 N.W.2d 644, 648 (quoting State v. Arguello , 2015 S.D. 103, ¶ 6, 873 N.W.2d 490, 493 ).3 Strand provided this testimony and her description ......
-
Piper v. Young
...review of [a] habeas corpus proceeding[ ] is limited because it ‘is a collateral attack on a final judgment.’ " Miller v. Young , 2018 S.D. 33, ¶ 12, 911 N.W.2d 644, 648 (quoting Vanden Hoek v. Weber , 2006 S.D. 102, ¶ 8, 724 N.W.2d 858, 861 ). It is not, as we have time and again held, a s......
-
State v. Evans
...with the statutes, namely how the jury selection process necessarily rendered the trial fundamentally unfair. See Miller v. Young , 2018 S.D. 33, ¶ 14, 911 N.W.2d 644, 648 ; Guthmiller v. Weber , 2011 S.D. 62, ¶ 16, 804 N.W.2d 400, 406. The process by which the court examined the potential ......
-
Miller v. Young
...jury selection process that allowed each party two more peremptory challenges than were permitted by SDCL § 23A-20-20. Miller v. Young, 911 N.W.2d 644, 647 (S.D. 2018). A court error resulted in an additional juror being seated and then passed for cause. Id. at 646. Because of this error, t......