Milligan v. Denham

Decision Date20 March 1986
Citation563 N.E.2d 595
PartiesJessie Sue Green MILLIGAN and Mary Ann Green Stone, Appellants (Plaintiffs Below), v. Janice Green DENHAM, Mary Meredith, and Janice Green Denham and James W. Funk, in their respective capacities as the named Co-Personal Representatives under the purported Last Will and Testament of Ralph D. Green, deceased, dated
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

Appeal from the Pike Circuit Court; Marvin D. Stratton, Cause No. 63C01-8901-CP-5.

Jeffrey R. Kinney, Kevin J. Messmer, Bamberger, Foreman, Oswald and Hahn, Evansville, for appellants.

David V. Miller, David E. Gray, Greg A. Granger, Bowers, Harrison, Kent & Miller, Evansville, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

In this will contest action, which was timely filed except for the claim that separate service by the sheriff was not achieved pursuant to Ind.Code Sec. 29-1-7-18, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's dismissal. Milligan v. Denham (1990), Ind.App., 553 N.E.2d 1265. The petition to transfer, and the dissenting opinion of Chief Judge Ratliff, argue that the decision of the Court of Appeals is in conflict with Willman v. Railing (1988), Ind.App., 529 N.E.2d 122. We grant transfer to resolve this dispute.

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 11(B)(3), we expressly adopt and incorporate by reference the opinion of the Court of Appeals in the present case.

Transfer is granted and this cause is remanded to the trial court.

SHEPARD, C.J., and DeBRULER, PIVARNIK and DICKSON, JJ., concur.

GIVAN, J., dissents without opinion.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Paramo v. Edwards
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • 12 Diciembre 1990
  • Willman v. Railing, 72A04-9004-CV-197
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 23 Mayo 1991
    ... ...         For these reasons, I would affirm the trial court ... --------------- ... 1 But see Milligan v. Denham (1990), Ind., 563 N.E.2d 595, adopting, Ind.App., 553 N.E.2d 1265 (where complaint was timely filed under IC 29-1-7-17, but clerk did not ... ...
  • Pica v. St. Joseph Cnty. Prob. Dep't
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Indiana
    • 24 Febrero 2012
  • Johnson v. Morgan
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 17 Agosto 2007
    ... ... otherwise would deny the [contestors] their statutory right to contest the will based upon the independent actions of the clerk's office." Milligan v. Denham, 553 N.E.2d 1265, 1266 (Ind.Ct.App.1990), opinion adopted by 563 N.E.2d 595 (Ind.1990) ...         Furthermore, we note that ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT