Mills v. Small, 71-1511.
| Decision Date | 30 August 1971 |
| Docket Number | No. 71-1511.,71-1511. |
| Citation | 446 F.2d 249 |
| Parties | Elizabeth MILLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L. K. SMALL, M.D., Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Elizabeth Mills, in pro. per.
Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Oakland, Cal., for defendant-appellee.
Before MERRILL, HUFSTEDLER and TRASK, Circuit Judges.
The plaintiff appeals from the district court's dismissal of her in propria persona action charging the defendant with certifying to the Superior Court of Alameda County on July 21, 1954, that he had examined the plaintiff when he had not. The defendant, Dr. Small, was at the time a medical examiner for the Superior Court and acting within the scope of his employment. Plaintiff sought general and exemplary damages.
The district court dismissed upon the grounds that the action was barred by the statute of limitations and that the appellee was immune from liability for the act charged. We affirm.
Although the complaint, filed in October 1970, does not state its basis for federal jurisdiction, we assume it charges a violation of her civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. That statute contains no limitation period but resort may be had to the California law. A liability "created by statute" must be brought within three years. Cal.Code Civ.P. § 338(1). As such her action is barred. Donovan v. Reinbold, 433 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1970); Smith v. Cremins, 308 F.2d 187 (9th Cir. 1962).
In addition, Dr. Small was acting in a quasi-judicial capacity and was immune from liability for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Burkes v. Callion, 433 F.2d 318 (9th Cir. 1970).
The judgment is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Randle v. City and County of San Francisco
...with the court. (E.g., Demoran v. Witt (9th cir. 1986) 781 F.2d 155 [probation officer sued concerning presentence report]; Mills v. Small (9th Cir.1971) 446 F.2d 249, cert. den. 404 U.S. 991, 92 S.Ct. 535, 30 L.Ed.2d 543 [medical examiner for court sued for falsely certifying that he had e......
-
Feldman v. Hoffman
...immunity to state and county medical officers and coroners. Lawyer v. Kernodle, 721 F.2d 632, 636 (8th Cir.1983) ; Mills v. Small, 446 F.2d 249 (9th Cir.1971), certiorari denied, 404 U.S. 991, 92 S.Ct. 535, 30 L.Ed.2d 543 (1971) (medical examiner was acting in a quasi-judicial capacity when......
-
Hines v. Board of Ed. of Covington, Ky.
...(10 years). 9 Strung v. Anderson, 452 F.2d 632 (9th Cir. 1971); Bergschneider v. Denver, 446 F.2d 569 (9th Cir. 1971); Mills v. Small, 446 F.2d 249 (9th Cir. 1971); Mason v. Schaub, 564 F.2d 308 (9th Cir. 1977). Apparently, the other circuits follow much the same approach to the problem as ......
-
Centennial Land and Development Co. v. Medford Tp.
...scheme. Thus, court-appointed deposition officers, Sarelas v. Sheehan, 353 F.2d 5 (7 Cir. 1965), and medical examiners, Mills v. Small, 446 F.2d 249 (9 Cir. 1971), Cert. den. 404 U.S. 991, 92 S.Ct. 535, 30 L.Ed.2d 543 (1971), have been granted immunity. Likewise, probation officers, Burkes ......