Milner v. United States
Decision Date | 15 November 1915 |
Docket Number | 4454. |
Citation | 228 F. 431 |
Parties | MILNER et al. v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
H. C Edwards, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellants.
William W. Ray, U.S. Atty., of Salt Lake City, Utah (David S. Cook Asst. U.S. Atty., of Salt Lake City, Utah, on the brief), for the United States.
Before CARLAND, Circuit Judge, and AMIDON and VAN VALKENBURGH District Judges.
This is an action by appellee to quiet the title to 5,564.28 acres of land situated in the county of Carbon, state of Utah. It is claimed by appellee that whatever apparent interest appellants have in the land was obtained by fraud, with the exception of Peter N. Campbell, who claims to have a lien by mortgage. Appellee was granted the relief prayed for in the court below, and appellants appeal.
Before proceeding to discuss the questions involved on this appeal it is proper to state that by sections 8 and 12 of the act of Congress approved July 16, 1894 (28 Stat. 109), there was granted to the state of Utah in the form of what is generally known as a 'floating grant,' many thousands of acres of land for the purpose of erecting an agricultural college, a school of mines, and a deaf and dumb asylum. Such lands were to be selected by the state from the unappropriated public lands of the United States in such manner as the Legislature thereof should provide, with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior. In 1896 the Legislature of Utah created a board of land commissioners and gave to it the control and management of the lands so granted. Laws Utah 1896, c. 80. The board was also empowered to select and register such lands, and after this was done it was its duty to take such action as was necessary to secure the approval of the Secretary of the Interior and a final transfer of said selected lands to the state.
Between December 10, 1900, and September 14, 1903, appellants Stanley B. Milner, Truth A. Milner, Harley O. Milner, and Samuel H. Gilson made application to said board of land commissioners to purchase the land involved in this action. The application to purchase by Truth A. Milner, who was the wife of Stanley B. Milner, was made by said Stanley B. Milner as the agent of his wife. The application to purchase made by Harley O. Milner was made by Stanley B. Milner as agent. The following is the form of the application to purchase made in each instance by the appellants:
that he hereby makes application to the state board of land commissioners for the selection by the state of the following described grazing lands (name the class):
No. Acres 320 N1/2
Sec. Tp. R. S. L. M. 26 12 S 11 E in satisfaction of any grant to the State.
'That he is a native-born citizen of the United States, over the age of 21 years, and that he has not purchased from the state of Utah, under the provisions of the land laws, more than four sections of grazing lands, or 320 acres of arid lands, or 160 acres of any other one class not named, together with the land now applied for; that he hereby agrees to purchase said land upon the following conditions:
Ellridge L. Thomas, Notary Public. ' 'Salt Lake City, Utah, Apr. 22, 1901.
'The state of Utah hereby agrees to the foregoing conditions, and the order for said selection is hereby made and approved.
Each one of these applications was accompanied by an affidavit of each applicant, or his or her agent, of the tenor and effect following:
'State of Utah, County of Salt Lake-- ss:
'April 18, 1901.
'S. B. Milner, Agent, being duly sworn according to law, deposes and says that he is the identical person who made application to select the land described in the agreement, of which this is a part, and who proposes to purchase the said land from the state of Utah; that he is well acquainted with the character of said described land, and with each and every legal subdivision thereof, having frequently passed over the same; that his personal knowledge of said land is such as to enable him to testify understandingly with regard thereto; that there is not, to his knowledge, within the limits thereof, any vein or lode of quartz or other rock in place bearing gold, silver, cinnabar, lead, tin, or copper, or any deposit of coal; that there is not within the limits of said land, to his knowledge, any placer, cement, gravel, or other valuable mineral deposit; that no portion of said land is claimed for mining purposes, under the local customs or rules of miners or otherwise; that no portion of said land is worked for mineral during any part of the year by any person or persons; that said land is essentially nonmineral land; and that his application therefor is not made for the purpose of fraudulently obtaining title to mineral land, but with the object of securing said land for agricultural purposes.
S. B. Milner, Agent.
'Subscribed and sworn to before me this 18th day of April, 1901.
'(Seal)
Ellridge L. Thomas, Notary Public.'
The board of land commissioners appointed Heber M. Wells and Byron Groo, who were respectively the president and secretary of said board, as selecting agents for the state. When a list of lands had been selected, these selecting agents filed it in the United States local land office at Salt Lake City, Utah. Said list was accompanied by the joint affidavit of said Heber M. Wells and Byron Groo of the tenor and effect following:
After the list of selected lands was filed in the local United States land office, the register and receiver of said land office made a certificate as follows:
'United States Land...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Standard Oil Company of California
...in suit are located. See United States v. Southern Pacific Co. (1919) 251 U.S. 1, 40 S.Ct. 47, 64 L.Ed. 97. And see: Milner v. United States (C.C.A. 8, 1915) 228 F. 431; Dunbar Lime Co. v. Utah-Idaho Sugar Co. (C.C.A. 1926) 17 F. (2d) 351; West v. Standard Oil Co., supra; United States v. S......
-
United States v. Carbon County Land Co.
...land in Carbon county, Utah, the original litigation having been commenced on January 7, 1907. The earlier cases are Milner v. United States (C. C. A. 8) 228 F. 431, appeal dismissed, 248 U. S. 594, 39 S. Ct. 132, 63 L. Ed. 437; United States v. Carbon County Land Company (C. C. A. 8) 9 F.(......
-
Independent Coal Coke Co v. United States
...purposes. Sections 8 and 10, Act of July 16, 1894, c. 138, 28 Stat. 107, 109, 110. Mineral lands were not included. See Milner v. United States (C. C. A.) 228 F. 431, 439; United States v. Sweet, 245 U. S. 563, 38 S. Ct. 193, 62 L. Ed. 473; Mullan v. United States, 118 U. S. 271, 276, 6 S. ......
-
Izaak Walton League of America v. St. Clair
...1925), aff'd sub nom. Independent Coal & Coke Co. v. United States, 274 U.S. 640, 47 S.Ct. 714, 71 L.Ed. 1270 (1927); Milner v. United States, 228 F. 431 (8th Cir. 1915), appeal dismissed, 248 U.S. 594, 39 S.Ct. 132, 63 L.Ed. 437 (1918), or to recover the value of the lands fraudulently obt......