Milos v. Exxon Co., USA

• Decision Date: 22 February 1996
• Citation: Milos v. Exxon Co., USA, 671 A.2d 120, 143 N.J. 333 (N.J. 1996)
• Parties: Walter MILOS, Petitioner-Respondent, v. EXXON COMPANY, USA, Respondent-Appellant.
• Court: New Jersey Supreme Court

Page 333

143 N.J. 333

671 A.2d 120

Walter MILOS, Petitioner-Respondent, v.EXXON COMPANY, USA, Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued Jan. 29, 1996.

Decided Feb. 22, 1996.

Richard V. Jones, Florham Park, argued the cause for appellant(Bressler, Amery & Ross, attorneys).

Jerry M. Finn, Kenilworth, argued the cause for respondent(Schneider, Goldberger, Cohen, Finn, Solomon, Leder & Montalbano, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Rodriguez of the Appellate Division, reported at 281 N.J.Super. 194, 656 A.2d 1300(1995).

For affirmance--Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, STEIN and COLEMAN--6.

Opposed--none.