Milton v. State
Decision Date | 28 June 1902 |
Citation | 134 Ala. 42,32 So. 653 |
Parties | MILTON v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Crenshaw county; J. C. Richardson, Judge.
Lee Milton was convicted of manslaughter, and appeals. Affirmed.
The minute entry of thecourt as to the arraignment, etc., of the defendant, which was had upon March 12, 1902, was in words and figures as follows: etc. On the trial of the cause there was evidence introduced for the state tending to show that the defendant was guilty as charged in the indictment, while the evidence for the defendant tended to show that he cut the deceased in self-defense, and while the said deceased was about to strike him with a saw. During the examination of one Maddox as a witness for the state he testified that he arrived at the place where the deceased was cut a short time after the difficulty, and found the deceased lying on the ground. Thereupon the witness, in answer to a question as to whether Tom Acreman, the deceased, said anything about his condition while he was lying on the ground, testified that Acreman made the following statement: " ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Kuhnhausen
...173 S.W. 443; Kelly v. State, 3 Smedes & M. (Miss.) 518; Harris v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 227, 28 S.W.2d 813, 70 A.L.R. 1066; Milton v. State, 134 Ala. 42, 32 So. 653; People v. Ferguson, 124 Cal.App. 221, 12 P.2d 158, 960; Wilson v. State, 90 Okl.Cr. 180, 212 P.2d 172; Rigsby v. State, 55 Ok......
-
Kendall v. State
...v. State, 116 Ala. 454, 23 So. 162; Frazier v. State, 116 Ala. 442, 23 So. 134; Jones v. State, 116 Ala. 468, 23 So. 135; Milton v. State, 134 Ala. 42, 32 So. 653. See, also, Thomas v. State, 47 Fla. 99, 36 So. 161. (37 So. at The cases cited above each involved a conviction of murder. Our ......
-
Colson v. State
...v. State, 116 Ala. 454, 23 So. 162; Frazier v. State, 116 Ala. 442, 23 So. 134; Jones v. State, 116 Ala. 468, 23 So. 135; Milton v. State, 134 Ala. 42, 32 So. 653; v. State, 5 Tex. App. 552; Cordova v. State, 6 Tex. App. 207; 1 Bishop's New Crim. Proc. § 269. While some of these cited cases......
-
Starke v. State
... ... State, 5 Tex. App. 552; Cordova v. State, 6 Tex ... App. 207; Hurd v. State, 116 Ala. 440, 22 So ... 993; Stoball v. State, 116 Ala. 454, 23 So. 162; [49 ... Fla. 46] Frazier v. State, 116 Ala. 442, 23 So. 134; ... Jones v. State, 116 Ala. 468, 23 So. 135; Milton ... v. State, 134 Ala. 42, 32 So. 653. See, also, Thomas ... v. State (Fla.) 36 So. 161 ... Whether ... the record must show the order for the drawing of a special ... venire, and that defendant was present when it was made, are ... questions not raised by the assignments of ... ...