Miner, Ltd. v. Anguiano
Decision Date | 29 May 2019 |
Docket Number | EP-19-CV-00082-FM |
Citation | 383 F.Supp.3d 682 |
Parties | MINER, LTD., Plaintiff, v. Paul ANGUIANO, Paseo Del Norte Dock Products, Inc., Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas |
David W. Long-Daniels, Joshua Y. Joel, Mitchell A. Robinson, Pro Hac Vice, Greenberg Traurig, Atlanta, GA, Shira R. Yoshor, Greenberg Traurig, L.L.P., Houston, TX, for Plaintiff.
Gerald Green Howard, Ainsa Hutson Hester & Crews, LLP, El Paso, TX, for Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Before the court is "Plaintiff Miner, Ltd.'s Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction" ("Motion") [ECF No. 20], filed March 8, 2019 by Miner, Ltd. ("Plaintiff"); "Plaintiff Miner Ltd.'s Supplemental Brief in Support of Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction" ("Supplemental Brief") [ECF No. 33], filed April 29, 2019; and "Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction" [ECF No. 37], filed May 6, 2019 by Defendants Paul Anguiano ("Anguiano") and Paseo Del Norte Dock Products, Inc. ("PDN") (collectively, "Defendants"). After due consideration, the Motion is GRANTED.
On January 29, 2019, Plaintiff filed suit in the San Antonio Division of the Western District of Texas, seeking injunctive relief and damages arising out of alleged misconduct by Anguiano, a former employee of Plaintiff, and PDN, his new employer.1 Plaintiff makes the following allegations: (1) Anguiano solicited Plaintiff's clients in violation of the Amended Limited Liability Company Agreement of Miner ("Amended LLC Agreement")2 ; (2) Anguiano solicited Plaintiff's employees in violation of the Amended LLC Agreement3 ; (3) Anguiano "improperly disclosed and/or used Miner's propriety information—including its trade secrets—on behalf of Paseo Del Norte" in violation of the Amended LLC Agreement4 ; (4) Anguiano solicited Plaintiff's clients in violation of the non-competition, non-solicitation, and confidentiality covenants in the employment agreement ("Employment Agreement") signed at the time of his promotion to Account Executive5 ; (5) Anguiano solicited Plaintiff's employees in violation of the Employment Agreement6 ; (6) Anguiano "improperly disclosed and/or used Miner's propriety information—including its trade secrets—on behalf of Paseo Del Norte" in violation of the Employment Agreement7 ; (7) tortious interference8 ; (8) Anguiano and PDN misappropriated trade secrets in violation of the Defend Trade Secrets Act ("DTSA"), 18 U.S.C. § 1836 et seq.9 ; (9) Anguiano and PDN misappropriated trade secrets in violation of the Texas Uniform Trade Secrets Act ("TUTSA"), Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 134A.002 et seq.10 ; (10) Anguiano accessed Plaintiff's computer system in violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. § 103011 ; and (11) Anguiano breached a fiduciary duty to Plaintiff.12
Plaintiff is a national company that sells, installs, and services material handling equipment and loading dock products across the nation.13 Anguiano was an employee of Plaintiff for seventeen years.14 During his time with Plaintiff, he was employed as a salesman, account executive, president, and managing member of Miner El Paso.15
Anguiano became a managing member of Plaintiff in exchange for purchasing shares in Plaintiff in June 2012.16 On December 12, 2012, Anguiano and CI (MHE) Holdings, LLC—the private entity that acquired Plaintiff—entered into the "Subscription and Transaction Agreement" ("Subscription Agreement"),17 which contains a non-compete covenant and a non-solicitation covenant.18 It provides:
An attached appendix to the Subscription Agreement specifies that Anguiano was subject to a non-compete and non-solicitation period for a duration of two years from the closing of the sale.20
CI (MHE) Holdings, LLC and Anguiano entered into another agreement five days later on December 17, 2012: the "Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement" ("Amended LLC Agreement").21 It sets forth:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Stonecoat of Tex., LLC v. Procal Stone Design, LLC
...improper means; and (3) the defendant's use of the secret resulted in harm to the plaintiff. Id. (citing Miner, Ltd. v. Anguiano , 383 F. Supp. 3d 682, 702 (W.D. Tex. 2019) (citing Trilogy Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc. , 143 S.W.3d 452, 463 (Tex. App.—Austin 2004) )). Without ci......
-
Ray v. Lynass
... ... Prac. & Rem. Code ... §§ 134A.002-134A.003; 18 U.S.C. § 1831, et ... seq.; Miner, Ltd. v. Anguiano , 383 F.Supp.3d 682, ... 702 (W.D. Tex. 2019) ... ...
-
Recif Res., LLC v. Juniper Capital Advisors, L.P.
...plaintiff. See StoneCoat of Tex., LLC v. ProCal Stone Design, LLC, 426 F. Supp. 3d 311, 340 (E.D. Tex. 2019); Miner, Ltd. v. Anguiano, 383 F. Supp. 3d 682, 702 (W.D. Tex. 2019). B. Existence of a Trade Secret The first element of a TUTSA claim is that the information satisfies the definitio......
-
Utex Indus., Inc. v. Wiegand
...States ofAmerica, Inc., 836 F.3d 477, 492 (5th Cir. 2016) (citing In re Bass, 113 S.W.3d 735, 739 (Tex. 2003)); Miner, Ltd. v. Anguiano, 383 F. Supp. 3d 682, 703 (W.D. Tex. 2019) (same). The six factors to determine whether a plaintiff's information is a trade secret under Texas law are:(1)......
-
A New Frontier in Patent Bar Ethics?
...Trade Secrets Act because Admor did not establish that Lessary misappropriated any Admor trade secrets. Miner, Ltd. v. Anguiano , 383 F. Supp. 3d 682 (W.D. Tex. 2019). The plaintiff claimed that Anguiano misappropriated a sales quote sheet, an Excel calculator, a client list, and know-how a......
-
An Interview with Li-Hsien (Lily) Rin-Laures
...Trade Secrets Act because Admor did not establish that Lessary misappropriated any Admor trade secrets. Miner, Ltd. v. Anguiano , 383 F. Supp. 3d 682 (W.D. Tex. 2019). The plaintiff claimed that Anguiano misappropriated a sales quote sheet, an Excel calculator, a client list, and know-how a......
-
Patenting Nature
...Trade Secrets Act because Admor did not establish that Lessary misappropriated any Admor trade secrets. Miner, Ltd. v. Anguiano , 383 F. Supp. 3d 682 (W.D. Tex. 2019). The plaintiff claimed that Anguiano misappropriated a sales quote sheet, an Excel calculator, a client list, and know-how a......
-
Why Open Source Licenses with a Commons Clause May Become Less Common
...Trade Secrets Act because Admor did not establish that Lessary misappropriated any Admor trade secrets. Miner, Ltd. v. Anguiano , 383 F. Supp. 3d 682 (W.D. Tex. 2019). The plaintiff claimed that Anguiano misappropriated a sales quote sheet, an Excel calculator, a client list, and know-how a......