Minneapolis St Ry Co v. Herrick

Decision Date23 April 1888
PartiesMINNEAPOLIS & ST. L. RY. CO. v. HERRICK. 1
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

C. K. Davis, for plaintiff in error.

Edward J. Hill, for defendant in error.

FIELD, J.

The defendant is a corporation created under the laws of Minnesota, and in December, 1881, it operated a railroad ex- tending from Minneapolis, in that state, to Fort Dodge, in Iowa. A law of Iowa, then in force, provides that 'every corporation operating employes of such corporation, in damages sustained by any person, including employes of such corporation, in consequence of the neglect of agents, or by any mismanagement of the engineers or other employes of the corporation, and in consequence of the willful wrongs, whether of commission or omission, of such agents, engineers, or other employes, when such wrongs are in any manner connected with the use and operation of any railway on or about which they shall be employed, and no contract which restricts such liability shall be legal or binding.' On the 6th of December, 1881, the plaintiff was employed by the defendant as a brakeman on one of its cars, and on that day, in Webster, in Iowa, it became his duty to make a coupling of an engine and a freight car. The engine was in charge of one of its employes, an engineer, and, while the plaintiff was making the coupling, the engine was, by the negligence and mismanagement of the engineer, driven against the car, causing severe and permanent injuries to the plaintiff. To recover damages for the injuries thus sustained he brought this action in a district court of Minnesota, relying upon the law of Iowa quoted above. The defendant in its answer alleged, and on the trial contended, that this law was abrogated by that provision of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States, which declares that no state shall deprive any person of property without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. The district court held the law to be in full force, and that under it the railroad company was responsible to the plaintiff for the injuries sustained by him through the negligence of the engineer. The plaintiff accordingly recovered a verdict for $2,000, upon which judgment was entered. Upon appeal to the state supreme court the judgment was affirmed, and to review that judgment the case is brought here. We have just decided the case of Railway Co. v. Mackey, ante, 1161, where similar objections were...

To continue reading

Request your trial
100 cases
  • State v. Clausen
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • September 27, 1911
    ...... statute violated the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution. of the United States. And in Minneapolis, etc., Railway. Co. v. Herrick, 127 U.S. 210 [8 S.Ct. 1176, 32 L.Ed. 109], a statute of Iowa which extended liability for the. ......
  • Ballard v. Mississippi Cotton Oil Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • April 27, 1903
    ......35; 17 L. R. A., 145;. 35 Am. St. Rep., 27); People v. Kirk, 162 Ill. 138. (45 N.E. 830; 53 Am. St. Rep., 277); Lommen v. Minneapolis Gas Co., 65 Minn. 196 (68 N.W. 53; 33 L. R. A., 437; 60 Am. St. Rep., 450). I concede that the courts. have the power to say that there is no ... consistently with the constitutional requirements. In the. case of Minneapolis & St. Louis Co. v. Herrick, 127. U.S. 210 (8 S.Ct. 1176; 32 L. Ed., 109), the supreme court of. the United States upholds a similar statute as to railroads,. and does so on ......
  • Mathison v. Minneapolis Street Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Minnesota (US)
    • July 3, 1914
    ...to require argument. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Mackey, 127 U. S. 205, 8 Sup. Ct. 1161, 32 L. ed. 107; Minneapolis & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Herrick, 127 U. S. 210, 8 Sup. Ct. 1176, 32 L. ed. 109; Tullis v. Lake Erie & W. Ry. Co. 175 U. S. 348, 20 Sup. Ct. 136, 44 L. ed. 192; Mondou v. New York, N.......
  • Stoll v. Pacific Coast S.S. Co.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Western District of Washington)
    • April 28, 1913
    ...... 337, 55 L.Ed. 369, Ann. Cas. 1912C, 160; Missouri Pacific. Ry. Co. v. Mackey, 127 U.S. 205, 8 Sup.Ct. 1161, 32. L.Ed. 107; Minneapolis, etc., Ry. Co. v. Herrick, . 127 U.S. 210, 8 Sup.Ct. 1176, 32 L.Ed. 109; Railway Co. v. Pontius, 157 U.S. 209, 15 Sup.Ct. 585, 39 L.Ed. 675;. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT