Minnesota Company v. St Paul Company

Decision Date01 December 1864
CitationMinnesota Company v. St Paul Company, 69 U.S. 609, 17 L.Ed. 886, 2 Wall. 609 (1864)
PartiesMINNESOTA COMPANY v. ST. PAUL COMPANY
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
84 cases
  • Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Star Pub. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington
    • October 20, 1924
    ... ... effect bills were filed in the state court against the railway company by the state, requiring them to give effect to the new prescribed rates ... Justice Miller in Chicago, Mil. & St. P. Railway Co. v. Minnesota, 134 U. S. 418, 460, it was not competent for each individual having ... S. 505, 522, 4 S. Ct. 583, 28 L. Ed. 498; Minn. Co. v. St. Paul Co., 2 Wall. 609, 633, 17 L. Ed. 886; Central Trust Co. v. Bridges, 57 F ... ...
  • Peacock v. Thomas
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • February 21, 1996
    ... ... Hyde, supra, at 285, 4 S.Ct., at 31 (quoting Minnesota Co. v. St. Paul Co., 2 Wall. 609, 633, 17 L.Ed. 886 (1865)), or where ... ...
  • Brun v. Mann
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • November 7, 1906
    ... ... 260; Guardian Trust ... Co. v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company (C.C.A., 8th ... Circuit) 146 F. 337; Dewey v. West Fairmount Gas ... Coal Co., 123 U.S. 329, 8 Sup.Ct. 148, 31 L.Ed. 179; ... Minnesota Co. v. St. Paul Co., 2 Wall. 609, 17 L.Ed ... 886; Logan v. Patrick, 5 ... ...
  • Citibank, N. A. v. Data Lease Financial Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • May 18, 1981
  • Get Started for Free