Minnesota Tribune Co. v. Associated Press
| Decision Date | 31 January 1898 |
| Docket Number | 906. |
| Citation | 84 F. 921 |
| Parties | MINNESOTA TRIBUNE CO. v. ASSOCIATED PRESS. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Munn & Thygeson, for appellant.
W. D. Cornish and Emanuel Cohen, for appellee.
Before BREWER, Circuit Justice, THAYER, Circuit Judge, and RINER, District Judge.
The motion filed in this case on January 17, 1898, to modify the order of affirmance herein so as to direct the dismissal of the bill without prejudice to the complainant's right to sue at law, is denied for two reasons: First, because the majority of the court are of opinion that the decree of the circuit court dismissing the cause of action on its merits was right; and, second, because the motion to modify the order of affirmance in this court was not filed until long after the term had lapsed at which the order of affirmance was entered.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Burke v. Mead
... ... Co., 83 Ala. 498, 3 So. 449, 3 Am. St. 758; ... Minnesota Tribune Co. v. Associated Press, ... 27 C. C. A. 542, 84 F. 921; Russell ... ...
- Bluthenthal v. Southern Ry. Co.