Minnich v. Darling
Decision Date | 10 January 1894 |
Docket Number | 1,073 |
Citation | 36 N.E. 173,8 Ind.App. 539 |
Parties | MINNICH v. DARLING ET AL |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
From the Elkhart Circuit Court.
Judgment reversed, at the costs of appellees.
H. C Dodge, for appellant.
W. L Stonex and E. A. Dausman, for appellees.
It affirmatively appears that the judgment rendered by the trial court was based upon the first paragraph of the appellee's complaint. It is the ordinary action to recover judgment and to foreclose a materialman's lien for materials furnished to the owner of real estate for the construction of a dwelling house thereon.
The appellant filed an answer in denial, and it was agreed of record that all defenses might be given under this answer.
The court made a special finding of facts, and stated conclusions of law. They are substantially as follows:
And, as conclusions of law upon the facts, the court finds:
The appellant excepted to the conclusions of law and moved for a judgment in his favor on the findings. This motion was overruled, and the court rendered judgment in favor of the appellees, and decreed a foreclosure of the lien. The appellant then filed a motion for a new trial; this motion was also overruled. Each of these decisions of the trial court is assigned as error in this court.
The office of a special finding or verdict is to determine the facts which give rise to legal conclusions embraced within the issues formed by the pleadings of the parties. Such facts are the source and cause of the law. They are the result or effect of the evidence, and are sometimes denominated the inferential or ultimate facts. The purpose of a judicial inquiry is to ascertain the facts upon which the law depends. Every ultimate fact is intimately related to many other facts. These attendant facts, not being of controlling legal importance, are denominated the evidentiary or subsidiary facts. The special findings, generally speaking, should be limited exclusively to the ultimate facts proved by the evidence. Ordinarily no evidence, no evidentiary facts, no conclusions of law, have any proper place in the special findings, and, if so found, must be disregarded in stating the legal conclusions.
The appellees' complaint alleges, that the appellant purchased materials of them for the construction of a dwelling house; that said materials were so used; that they gave notice of their intention to hold a lien thereon; that the value of said materials is a given amount, and that same is due and unpaid.
To entitle them to the relief prayed for, it was necessary that they should prove, and that the court should find, that there was a contract for the purchase of the material between them and the appellant, the value of the materials, and the amount due and unpaid. Such facts would entitle the appellees to a personal judgment. To entitle them to the enforcement of a lien, it was necessary to prove, and for the court to find that the materials were furnished for, and used in, the construction of the house, and the giving of the notice of intention to hold a lien. If these facts are...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ins. Co. of N. Am. v. Taylor
...v. Corning, 21 Mich. 242; The Montmorency Gravel Road Co. v. Rock, 41 Ind. 263; Cruzan v. Smith et al., 41 Ind. 288; Minnich v. Darling, 8 Ind. App. 539, 36 N.E. 173; Potwin v. Blasher et al., 9 Wash. 460, 37 P. 710; Blumenthal v. Asay, 3 Utah 507, 24 P. 1056; Hicklin v. McClear, 18 Ore. 12......
-
Judah v. F.H. Cheyne Elec. Co.
...Moneyhum, 146 Ind. 147, 152, 44 N. E. 1106, 34 L. R. A. 141;Sweetser v. Snodgrass, 7 Ind. App. 609, 611, 34 N. E. 842;Minnich v. Darling, 8 Ind. App. 539-546, 36 N. E. 173. [6] It is also true that the failure to find any material fact is the equivalent of a finding against the party upon w......
-
Judah v. F. H. Cheyne Electric Company
... ... Moneyhun (1896), 146 Ind. 147, 152, 44 N.E. 1106, 34 ... L.R.A. 141; Sweetser v. Snodgrass (1893), 7 ... Ind.App. 609, 611, 34 N.E. 842; Minnich v ... Darling (1894), 8 Ind.App. 539, 546, 36 N.E. 173 ... [101 N.E. 1042] ... It is also true that the failure to find any material fact is ... ...
-
American Bonding Co. v. State ex rel. Whisler
...province of a special finding to find the ultimate facts, and the finding of evidentiary facts is not sufficient. Minnich v. Darling et al., 8 Ind. App. 542, 36 N. E. 173;Taylor v. Canaday, 155 Ind. 675, 57 N. E. 524, 59 N. E. 20;Perkins v. Hayward et al., 124 Ind. 450, 24 N. E. 1033. The f......