Minnus v. Minnus
Decision Date | 05 June 1978 |
Citation | 63 A.D.2d 966,405 N.Y.S.2d 504 |
Parties | Ann MINNUS, Respondent, v. Herbert MINNUS, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Goldstein & Goldstein, Brooklyn (Gloria Goldstein, Brooklyn, of counsel), for appellant.
Leonard Siegel, Freeport (Edward R. Siegel, Freeport, of counsel), for respondent.
Before HOPKINS, J. P., and TITONE, GULOTTA and O'CONNOR, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In a matrimonial action, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 27, 1977, as granted the plaintiff wife's cross motion for exclusive possession of the matrimonial residence and an order of protection directing defendant to cease and desist from physically abusing plaintiff.
Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements.
Section 234 of the Domestic Relations Law authorizes the court to make orders concerning possession of the marital residence "as in the court's discretion justice requires having regard to the circumstances of the case and of the respective parties".Here, where the wife has uncontested legal title to the house, has made sworn factual allegations of prior incidents of violence and abuse, and has previously obtained a protective...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Leibowits v. Leibowits
... ... 16 N.Y.2d 564, 260 N.Y.S.2d 838, 208 N.E.2d 783), by excluding one spouse from premises occupied by another (Minnus v. Minnus, 63 A.D.2d 966, 405 N.Y.S.2d 504), or by restraining transfers of property pendente lite (Zeeve v. Zeeve, 44 A.D.2d 838, 355 N.Y.S.2d 472; ... ...
-
People v. Simmons
... ... 183 N.Y.S.3d 722 (McKinney's Practice Commentaries, Alan D. Scheinkman, DRL 252 [online version 2020]; Minnus v. Minnus , 63 A.D.2d 966, 405 N.Y.S.2d 504 [2d Dep't 1978] ). Family Court Act 1027 and 1028 mandate prompt hearings where a child has been removed ... ...
-
Lidsky v. Lidsky
... ... AD2d 893 [255 N.Y.S.2d 272] aff'd 16 NY2d 564 [260 N.Y.S.2d 838, 208 N.E.2d 783] ), by excluding one spouse from premises occupied by another (Minnus v Minnus, 63 AD2d 966 [405 N.Y.S.2d 504] ), or by restraining transfers of property pendente lite (Zeeve v Zeeve, 44 AD2d 838 [355 N.Y.S.2d 472]; ... ...
-
Preston v. Preston
... ... Blumenfeld, supra ), the existence of a court order of protection (see, DeMillio v. DeMillio, 106 A.D.2d 424, 482 N.Y.S.2d 517; Minnus v. Minnus, 63 A.D.2d 966, 405 N.Y.S.2d 504), uncontroverted medical evidence ( see, King v. King, 109 A.D.2d 779, 486 N.Y.S.2d 291), or corroborative ... ...