Minot Special Sch. Dist. No. 1 v. Olsness
Decision Date | 17 February 1926 |
Docket Number | No. 5006.,5006. |
Citation | 53 N.D. 683,208 N.W. 968 |
Parties | MINOT SPECIAL SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1 et al. v. OLSNESS, State Commissioner of Insurance. |
Court | North Dakota Supreme Court |
Chapter 159, Laws 1919 (chapter 154, Laws 1925) establishing a state fire and tornado fund for the purpose of furnishing fire and tornado insurance upon the property of the state, and counties, cities and other political subdivisions, is not unconstitutional on the ground that it abrogates or impairs the right of freedom of contract.
Said chapter 159, Laws 1919, does not violate any express or implied constitutional guaranty of the right of local self-government.
The wisdom, necessity, or expediency of legislation are matters for legislative, and not for judicial, determination.
Whether the plan of insurance provided by the State Fire and Tornado Fund Law is adequate or inadequate, safe or unsafe, are matters for legislative, and not for judicial, determination.
A litigant can be heard to question the validity of an act only when and in so far as it is applied to his disadvantage.
Chapter 159, Laws 1919, does not create an indebtedness on the part of the state of North Dakota at all. Any claim arising by reason of a loss under said statute is a claim against the state fire and tornado fund alone.
Said chapter 159, Laws 1919, is not unconstitutional on the ground that it delegates taxing power to the commissioner of insurance.
Appeal from District Court, Burleigh County; Jansonius, Judge.
Proceeding by the Minot Special School District No. 1 and others against S. A. Olsness, as State Commissioner of Insurance, for an injunction. From a judgment dismissing the proceeding, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.L. J. Palda, Jr., C. D. Aaker, and C. E. Brace, all of Minot, for appellants.
George F. Shafer, Atty. Gen., and John Thorpe, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
This is a proceeding to prohibit and enjoin the commissioner of insurance of this state from enforcing the State Fire and Tornado Fund Law (chapter 159, Laws 1919, chapter 154, Laws 1925) against the plaintiff school district. Plaintiffs base their right of action solely upon the ground that the State Fire and Tornado Fund Law is unconstitutional. The trial court dismissed the proceeding and the plaintiffs have appealed.
Section 1 of the act reads:
“On and after August 1st, 1919, no officer or agent of this state and no person or persons having charge of any public buildings or property of the state shall pay out any public moneys or funds on account of any insurance against loss by fire or tornado or shall in any manner contract for or incur any indebtedness against the state on account of any such insurance upon any of the public buildings, furniture or fixtures or property of any kind whatever belonging to the state except in the manner hereafter provided.”
Section 2 requires the various state officers to make reports to the insurance commissioner of state buildings and property and the insurable value thereof.
Section 3 provides that on or between July 1 and August 1, 1919, and annually thereafter, the commissioner of insurance shall provide for the insurance in the state fire and tornado fund of all state property subject to destruction by fire or tornado for an amount not to exceed 90 per cent. of the actual value of the property, as such value is determined by the commissioner and the officer or board having control of such property; that the commissioner shall fix the rate of premium which in his opinion is the average rate charged by responsible fire and tornado companies doing business in this state, and issuing policies on property of similar kinds and exposed to risk of fire and tornado in like manner; that the commissioner shall ascertain the amount of insurance on all such property and provide for such additional insurance in the state fire and tornado fund as may be necessary.
Section 4 provides that the commissioner of insurance shall certify to the state auditor the amount of insurance carried upon property belonging to the state, together with a statement of the amount of premium, and requires the state auditor to issue a warrant for the amount of the premium.
Section 5 provides that on August 1st of each year each county auditor, city auditor, town village, and school district clerk, as the case may be-
“shall report to the commissioner of insurance the sound, depreciated or insurable value of each building or risk and contents therein, and such other information as may be required by the commissioner of insurance, on forms provided by him.”
Section 6 reads as follows:
Section 7 provides that the commissioner of insurance shall not cause any insurance policies to be canceled-
“which are in effect on August 1st, 1919, but shall provide for the insurance in the state fire and tornado fund of buildings and property as hereinbefore stated, increasing the amount of insurance in the state fire and tornado fund at such times as the policies existing on above date may from time to time require so as to maintain at all times the amount of insurance required by the provisions of this act.”
Section 8 provides for the adjustment and payment of losses, and it is provided:
Section 9 relates to the readjustment of rates, and provides that, when the state fire and tornado fund shall equal 10 per cent. of the risks carried-
“it shall be the duty of the commissioner of insurance to so adjust the premium to be paid as to reduce the amount to the lowest possible amount consistent with maintaining said fire and tornado fund at said per cent.”
Section 10 provides for the arbitration of the amount of loss, when there is a dispute in regard thereto, and provides the procedure where arbitration is had.
Section 11 authorizes the commissioner of insurance to employ the necessary help, and places a limitation upon the amount to be expended for this purpose.
Section 12 provides that the provisions of the act shall not apply to property of any town or school district located outside of the incorporated limits of any city or village, unless a written application for such insurance is made and the same is approved by the commissioner of insurance.
Section 13 relates to the classification and limitation of risks. In general the section classifies buildings as regards their fireproof character and limits the amount of insurance which may be carried by the state fire and tornado fund upon any one risk within each of the classes so enumerated. And it empowers the commissioner of insurance to place reinsurance on any risk with some reliable fire and tornado insurance company or companies for the amount of insurance required to be placed upon such risk in excess of the limit authorized to be carried in the state fire and tornado fund.
Section 14 empowers the commissioner of insurance to collect the entire premium for insurance from the state and the various political subdivisions thereof, and provides that he shall deposit the same in ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gruen v. State Tax Commission
... 211 P.2d 651 35 Wn.2d 1 GRUEN v. TAX COMMISSION et al. No. 31083 ... has affirmatively determined any special ... facts requisite to the validity of the ... Cowychee & Wide Hollow ... Irrigation Dist., 15 Wash. 480, 46 P. 1035, 1036, read: ... supreme court of North Dakota, in Minot Special School ... Dist. v. Olsness, 53 ... ...
-
Asbury Hospital v. Cass County
... ... by the Court ... 1 ... The Declaratory Judgments Act, Supp.1925, ... shall be granted, changed or amended by special ... law, except in the case of such municipal, ... 700, 43 S.Ct. 689, 67 L.Ed. 1186; Minot Special School ... District v. Olsness, 53 N.D ... ...
-
Lang v. City of Cavalier
... ... public utilities by the issuance of special assessment warrants or bonds or by both warrants ... Held , (1) that the preliminary resolution, the notice of ... D. 173, 150 N. W. 565;First Nat. Bank v. Olsness, 48 N. D. 758, 186 N. W. 751;Davis v. McLean ... Olson, 43 N. D. 619, 175 N. W. 714;Minot Special School District v. Olsness, 53 N. D. 683, ... ...
-
State v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.
... ... 1. The state has a right to bring an action to ... Milhollan, 50 N.D. 184, 195 N.W. 292; Minot Special School Dist. No. 1, v. Olsness, 53 N.D ... ...