Minturn v. The Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company
Decision Date | 06 April 1918 |
Docket Number | 21,479 |
Citation | 102 Kan. 885,172 P. 17 |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Parties | HAROLD MINTURN, by his Next Friend, MARTHA MINTURN, Appellee, v. THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellant |
Decided January, 1918.
Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 1; EDWARD L FISCHER, judge.
Judgment affirmed.
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.
COMPENSATION ACT--Injury to Minor--Presentation of Claim--Statute of Limitations. The action of a minor by his next friend to recover under the workmen's compensation act is not barred because the written claim for compensation was not served within three months from the date of the injury--no guardian having been appointed. (Gen. Stat. 1915, § 5904.)
J. K. Cubbison, and William G. Holt, both of Kansas City, for the appellant.
Henry Meade, W. J. McCarty, and W. C. Rickel, all of Kansas City, for the appellee.
A minor, by his next friend, brought this action to recover under the workmen's compensation act for an injury to his hand, received while working in the defendant's plant. A demurrer to his evidence was overruled, and a recovery was had. The defendant appeals, and contends that the plaintiff cannot prevail because the three months' claim for compensation provided by the statute was not given, six months having elapsed before the defendant was notified.
Section 22 of the original act, as amended by the act of 1913, (Gen. Stat. 1915, § 5916) provides that the action shall not be maintainable unless a claim for compensation has been made within three months after the accident, or, in case of death, within six months from the date thereof. If this statute governed, the defendant would be correct in its position. But section 5904 of the General Statutes of 1915 provides:
"In case an injured workman is mentally incompetent or a minor . . . at the time when any right, privilege or election accrues to him under this act, his guardian may, in his behalf, claim and exercise such right, privilege, or election, and no limitation of time, in this act provided for, shall run, so long as such incompetent or minor has no guardian."
The petition alleged that no guardian had been appointed, and that the minor was twenty years of age. The action was begun January 15, 1917, and the injury occurred August 10, 1916. A written claim for compensation was served by him January 15 1917, signed by his mother and next friend, no guardian...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Latcholia v. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n
...Inc., 169 Tenn. 638, 90 S.W.2d 524; Franse v. Knox Porcelain Corporation, 171 Tenn. 49, 100 S.W.2d 647; Minturn v. Proctor & Gamble Mfg. Co., 102 Kan. 885, 172 P. 17; Matlock v. A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co., Mo.App., 43 S.W.2d 871; Westrich v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, 50 Ohio App. 234, ......
-
Brenn v. City of St. John
... ... company's linemen from making repairs on telephone line ... See Minturn v. Manufacturing Co., 102 Kan. 885, 172 P ... 17." Page ... ...
-
Baxter v. Chicago, R.I. & P. Ry. Co.
... ... made by her to the adjuster of the railway company, ... as well as the accident and death of the workman as ... case the baby was within the excepted class. See Minturn ... v. Mfg. Co., 102 Kan. 885, 172 P. 17 ... The yard was ... somewhat like a manufacturing plant in which the material ... was to be moved from one ... ...
- Kunz v. Bayne