Mirabile v. Profy

• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
• Citation: Mirabile v. Profy, 464 N.Y.S.2d 373, 95 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
• Decision Date: 13 June 1983
• Parties: Rose MIRABILE, et al., Appellants, v. Dr. Albert PROFY, et al., Respondents.

Page 373

464 N.Y.S.2d 373

95 A.D.2d 800

Rose MIRABILE, et al., Appellants, v. Dr. Albert PROFY, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division Second Department.

June 13, 1983

Creditor & Creditor, Forest Hills, (Richard Creditor, Forest Hills, of counsel), for appellants. Morris, Duffy, Ivone & Jensen, New York City, (Patricia D'Alvia, New York City, on the brief), for respondents.

In a medical malpractice action, plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated August 24, 1982, as dismissed their complaint against defendant Profy for lack of jurisdiction over said defendant. Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. (See Chalk v. Catholic Med. Center of Brooklyn, Queens,...