Mississippi Industries v. FERC, 85-1611
| Decision Date | 24 June 1987 |
| Docket Number | 85-1613,85-1615,85-1647,85-1624,85-1719 and 85-1772.,No. 85-1611,85-1623,85-1712,85-1637,85-1616 to 85-1621,85-1626,85-1640,85-1611 |
| Parties | MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit |
Before EDWARDS and BORK, Circuit Judges, WRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge.
Upon reconsideration of the petition for rehearing of the City of New Orleans, Louisiana, the petition of Mississippi Industries, the Mississippi Attorney General and the Mississippi Public Service Commission, and of the petition of Mississippi Power and Light Company, it is
ORDERED by the Court, on its own motion, that the order of April 3, 1987, 814 F.2d 773 denying rehearing by the panel is hereby vacated. It is
FURTHER ORDERED by the Court, on its own motion, that the petitions are granted. It is
FURTHER ORDERED by the Court, on its own motion, that, for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of January 6, 1987, 808 F.2d 1525 the Commission's decision is reversed and this case is remanded for reconsideration of the decision to equalize the capacity costs of all nuclear plants, and for an explanation of the criteria used to determine what constitutes "undue discrimination" and of why the Commission's ultimate decision is not unduly discriminatory. It is
FURTHER ORDERED by the Court, on its own motion, that those parts of Section III(C)(2) of the opinion of January 6, 1987, which address these two issues, specifically, pages 1560 to the end of the first paragraph on page 1563 and the judgment of the same date insofar as it concerns those issues, are hereby vacated.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
New Orleans Public Service, Inc v. Council of City of New Orleans
... ... The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) allocated the cost of the Grand Gulf 1 nuclear reactor among several ... Last Term, in Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Mississippi ex rel. Moore, 487 U.S. 354, 108 S.Ct ... Mississippi Industries v. FERC, 257 U.S.App.D.C. 244, 808 F.2d 1525, rehearing granted and ... ...
-
Mississippi Power Light Company v. Mississippi Moore, 86-1970
... ... sales of electricity, which are regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and in retail sales, which are subject to the jurisdiction of the Mississippi Public Service ... Mississippi Industries v. FERC, 257 U.S. App.D.C. 244, 285, 808 F.2d 1525, 1566 (1987). 8 ... Page 365 ... The ... ...
-
PPL Energyplus, LLC v. Nazarian
...a large component of wholesale rates.” See Miss. Indus. v. F.E.R.C., 808 F.2d 1525, 1541 (D.C.Cir.1987), vacated in part on other grounds,822 F.2d 1104 (D.C.Cir.1987); see also Entergy La., Inc. v. La. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 539 U.S. 39, 43, n. 1, 123 S.Ct. 2050, 156 L.Ed.2d 34 (2003) (“Where, ......
-
Alliance for Affordable Energy, Inc. v. Council of City of New Orleans
... ... 1 Along with Arkansas Power and Light [AP & L], Mississippi Power and Light [MP & L], and Louisiana Power and Light [LP & L], it is a ... Power Sales Agreement with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [FERC], which set out the shares of Grand Gulf 1 output each company was ... The FERC allocations were affirmed on rehearing. Mississippi Industries v. FERC, 808 F.2d 1525, modified on rehearing 822 F.2d 1104 (D.C.Cir.), ... ...