Missouri Div. of Family Services v. Wilson, WD

Decision Date26 January 1993
Docket NumberNo. WD,WD
Citation849 S.W.2d 104
PartiesIn re: MISSOURI DIVISION OF FAMILY SERVICES, Appellant, v. George WILSON, Respondent. 46028.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Linda Ray-McKenna, Jefferson City, for appellant.

Edward F. Ford III, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, P.J., and TURNAGE and SPINDEN, JJ.

SPINDEN, Judge.

The director of the Division of Family Services (DFS) concluded that George Wilson was not eligible for Medicaid benefits. The trial court disagreed and reversed the director's decision, and DFS appeals. We affirm the judgment of the circuit court.

DFS decided that Wilson was ineligible because he is the beneficiary of a trust established for him by his former employer, Carolyn Miller. The trust agreement states the reason for Miller's creating the trust:

[F]or many years George H. Wilson of Kansas City, Missouri has been employed by [Miller] and also by [Miller's] deceased husband, Van Roy Miller, but is now approaching an age when he will no longer be able to work and is apprehensive as to means for the support of himself and his wife in the event of such disability; and in appreciation of this long and faithful period of service and to dispel any of such apprehensions, [Miller] wishes to provide for said George H. Wilson and his wife, Hazel Wilson, an income adequate for their needs as long as they shall live, and in order to accomplish this wishes [sic] to establish a trust for their benefit as hereinafter provided[.]

Miller funded the trust with a one-time payment of $90,000. The trust agreement mandated [T]he Trustee shall pay and distribute to ... Wilson a pension at the rate of $5,200.00 per year, to be paid in monthly installments of $433.33 each month, from the income of the trust to the extent its income is available for that purpose, or from corpus to the extent the income is insufficient. Such payments shall continue as long as ... Wilson shall live; and if he shall be survived by his wife, Hazel Wilson, then from and after his death payments at the same rate shall thereafter be made to his wife, Hazel Wilson, as long as she shall live.

....

... If at any time or from time to time, in the sole discretion of the Trustee, the aggregate of the payments to George H. Wilson or Hazel Wilson hereunder and the funds available from all other sources should be insufficient to provide adequately for the support, maintenance and health of said beneficiaries or their funeral expenses in the event of the death of either of them, the Trustee may pay to either of them or expend for the purposes mentioned such sum or sums out of the income, if available, or out of the corpus of the trust estate as the Trustee, in its sole discretion shall deem advisable for such purpose.

The trust terminates on the death of Wilson and his wife and the corpus and any undistributed income is to be distributed to Miller's three daughters.

On June 8, 1990, Wilson applied for Medicaid benefits. DFS' director deemed Wilson ineligible for benefits because the trust principal put Wilson's available resources above the statutory maximum. Section 208.100.5, RSMo 1986, directs that we review the trial court's reversal of this decision pursuant to § 536.140, RSMo 1986. DFS contends that the trial court's reversal was unauthorized by law. Section 536.140.2(4). In particular, DFS asserts that its determination was based upon its interpretation of Tidrow v. Director, Missouri State Division of Family Services, 688 S.W.2d 9 (Mo.App.1985), and as such was authorized by law.

We disagree. "Our review of a question of law is not in any way restricted or controlled by the agency's decision." Estate of Wallace v. Director, Missouri State Division of Family Services, 628 S.W.2d 388, 389 (Mo.App.1982).

The purpose of the Medicaid program is to provide medical assistance to needy persons whose income and resources are insufficient to meet the expenses of health care. Couch v. Director, Missouri State Division of Family Services, 795 S.W.2d 91, 93 (Mo.App.1990). The legislature did not intend for the Medicaid program to replace other means which provide assistance for these needy persons. As stated in § 208.153.1, RSMo Supp.1990:

The benefits available under these sections shall not replace those provided under other federal or state law or under other contractual or legal entitlements of the persons receiving them, and all persons shall be required to apply for and utilize all benefits available to them and to pursue all causes of action to which they are entitled.

In determining a claimant's eligibility, DFS must consider the claimant's circumstances, "including his living conditions, earning capacity, income and resources, from whatever source received[.]" Section 208.010.1. Unmarried individuals who have $1000 or more in resources and married couples who have more than $2,000 in resources are not eligible for Medicaid benefits. Section 208.010.2(4).

Federal law governs Missouri's participation in the Medicaid program. Couch, 795 S.W.2d at 93. The Medicaid Act requires states to base their assessments of applicants' financial need only on resources available to an applicant:

A state plan for medical assistance must ... include reasonable standards ... for determining...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Romo v. Kirschner, 1
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • 17 Enero 1995
    ...denied, Okl. Dept. of Human Serv. v. Trust Co. of Okl., 506 U.S. 906, 113 S.Ct. 300, 121 L.Ed.2d 224 (1992); Missouri Div. of Family Serv. v. Wilson, 849 S.W.2d 104 (Mo.App.1993). That approach merely gives license to transfer assets into a trust which, if the trust documents recite an inte......
  • Striegel v. South Dakota Dept. of Social Services
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • 20 Abril 1994
    ...in a liquidated sum and has the legal ability to make such sum available for support and maintenance." Missouri Div. of Family Serv. v. Wilson, 849 S.W.2d 104, 107 (Mo.App.1993) (citing 45 C.F.R. Sec. Should an applicant be the beneficiary of a MQT, as defined by 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1396a(k)(2),......
  • Lowes v. Lowes
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 25 Mayo 1995
    ...provided that its state program is not intended to replace other means of assistance for needy persons. Missouri Div. of Family Serv. v. Wilson (1993), Mo.Ct.App., 849 S.W.2d 104, 106. Missouri has expressed its policy on this issue as The benefits available under these sections shall not r......
  • State ex rel. Nixon v. Turpin
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 8 Junio 1999
    ...them together. Whether trust income is available to or due a beneficiary depends on the grantor's intent. Missouri Div. of Family Servs. v. Wilson, 849 S.W.2d 104, 107 (Mo.App.1993). In construing wills, the familiar rule prevails that they are to be construed as a whole; liberally construe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT