Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.
Decision Date | 01 January 1888 |
Citation | 33 F. 803 |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana |
Parties | MISSOURI PAC. RY. CO. v. TEXAS & P. RY. CO., (PRICE, Intervenor.) |
Sam Price, intervenor, filed a claim against the receivers of the Texas & Pacific Railway Company for damages for personal injuries sustained while in their employ. The matter was referred to J. R. G. Pitkin, as master, who reported to the following effect:
'That the record discloses at the next stage of inquiry, and on the testimony of witnesses, all colored, an admixture of falsehood which challenges attention. Of the four-- Price, Beavor, Orr, Prince-- of the hands present at the hearing, and in accord as to the number and names of the crew of the six upon the car, three distinctly deny, and one does not remember, that Hill was thereon, as he deposes. That Hill concurs with section-hand Conway and section foreman Locket, neither at the scene of injury, and Prince, between each of the latter two of whom and complainant no friendly feelings appear to subsist, in the statement that during a week after said injury the complainant attended a festival, seemed as well as usual, walked about, and danced nimbly; Prince adding that on the day after the injury he saw complainant, gun in hand, hunting in the Sabine bottoms.
'That since some reasonable conclusion must be reached in the premises despite the obliquity shown in this record, and since the testimony preponderates against Hill as to his presence on the car, and thus impairs his credibility as to claimant's presence at the festival, in respect of which the testimony of Locket and Prince likewise invites question by reason both of their apparent disposition against the complainant and of the distinct testimony of a physician, who appears to be a candid and impartial witness, the master concludes that a man under medical treatment, at his own house, of three fractured ribs, could not, on the same day, have been out hunting, nor in a condition, during the same week, to expend his vitality and jar his frame by active dancing; and the master finds greater reason, as to said recited particulars, for confidence in the denial of complainant than in the testimony of the negroes Hill, Locket, Conway, and Prince, the last-named of whom was upon the car and states, without support by the other witnesses thereon, that complainant received his hurt after having needlessly jumped off in front of the car to arrest its progress, instead of having properly awaited its halt. That while the record does not justify faith in his declaration that the injury to his hip-joint dates from said night, the circumstances otherwise shown warrant a presumption that he did not have knowledge of the condition of the car, and the hazard presented by reason whereof, while within the line of his duty and in its discharge, within the exercise of ordinary care, he received, as to three ribs, injuries that did not disable him from earning the same wages in the same service a month later; and that he is entitled to damages, in view of the value of his lost time during said period, $35; of his expenditures or indebtedness for medical care and medicines, $37.50; and of the blended mental and physical pain sustained, without shown impairment of health, by reason of said temporary injuries, the proximate cause whereof was the negligence of the foreman, to whom only appears to have been known the recited defect of said car, the safe condition of which, under the master's obligation of ordinary prudence to provide reasonably fit appliances, the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Chauncey v. Dyke Bros.
... ... In ... the case of United States v. Southern Pac. R. Co., ... 184 U.S. 49, 56, 57, 22 Sup.Ct. 285, 46 L.Ed. 524, the ... supreme court further ... 666, 9 Sup.Ct. 177, 32 L.Ed. 547; Clyde v. Railroad Co ... (C.C.) 59 F. 394, 399; Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v ... Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. (C.C.) 33 F. 803, 806; ... Hennessey v. Budde (C.C.) ... ...
- Naylor v. New York Cent. & H.R.R. Co.