Missouri Pacific Railroad Company Secured Serial Bondholders Committee v. Thompson

CourtU.S. Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtHARLAN
CitationMissouri Pacific Railroad Company Secured Serial Bondholders Committee v. Thompson, 350 U.S. 959, 76 S.Ct. 347, 100 L.Ed. 833 (1956)
Decision Date30 January 1956
Docket NumberNo. 568,568
PartiesMISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 5 1/4% SECURED SERIAL BONDHOLDERS COMMITTEE et al., petitioners, v. Guy A. THOMPSON, Trustee, Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor, et al

Mr. William H. Biggs, for petitioner Missouri Pacific Railroad Company 5 1/4% Secured Serial Bondholders Committee.

Mr. Frederick M. Myers, for petitioners Huston and others.

Messrs. Russell L. Dearmont and Thos. T. Railey, for Thompson and others.

Messrs. Clair B. Hughes and Allan S. Kuller, for Manufacturers Trust Co.

Messrs. DeLancey C. Smith, Henry I. Stimson and Forrest P. Tralles, for Protective Committee for Secured Serial 5 1/4% Gold Bonds of Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. and others.

Messrs. David M. Potts and Abraham Wilson, for Empire Trust Co.

Mr. Douglas B. Steimle, for Bondholders Protective Committee for Missouri Pacific Railroad Company General Mortgage Bonds.

Messrs. William P. Palmer and James I. Wyer, for Bankers Trust Co.

Messrs. Robert H. McRoberts and Thomas S. McPheeters, Jr., for St. Louis Union Trust Co.

Mr. John M. MacGregor, for Protective Committee for Holders of Preferred Stock of Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.

Messrs. Harold C. McCollom and G. Carroll Stribling, for Irving Trust Co.

Messrs. Leonard D. Adkins and S. Mayner Wallace, for Savings Bank Trust Co.

Messrs. Hugh L. M. Cole and William G. Pettus, Jr., for City Bank Farmers Trust Co.

Messrs. Edward F. Colladay and Everett Paul Griffin, for Wright and others.

Messrs. Walter H. Brown, Jr., and Allan F. Conwill, for New York Trust Co.

Mr. Abraham K. Weber, for Rosenberger and others.

Messrs. Felix A. Fishman and Lyonel E. Zunz for Oscar Gruss & Son.

Messrs. Burton K. Wheeler, Edward K. Wheeler, and Eldon

Page 959-Continued.

S. Olson, for Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.

Mr. Percival E. Jackson, for Jackson and others.

Mr. Emmet McCaffery, for Chemical Corn Exchange Bank.

Mr. John L. J. Hart, for Alleghany Corporation.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Denied.

Mr. Justice HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
21 cases
  • Doe v. Hampton
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • November 3, 1977
    ... ... Cf. Thompson v. Clifford, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 351, 355, 356, 408 ... -1834, 10 L.Ed.2d 778, 783-785 (1963) (committee bound by its rules where "throughout the rules, ... ...
  • Campbell v. Department of Civil Service
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • April 1, 1963
    ... ... State Civil Service Investigating Committee (1917). Subsequently, the Legislature adopted a ... ...
  • Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. SARASOTA-FRUITVILLE D. DIST.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • January 14, 1958
    ...not liable for torts as such under Florida law, Rabin v. Lake Worth Drainage Dist., Fla., 82 So.2d 353, certiorari denied 350 U.S. 958, 76 S.Ct. 348, 100 L.Ed. 833; Arundel Corp. v. Griffin, 89 Fla. 128, 103 So. 422, is liable to a Railway on an indemnity-hold-harmless agreement in a canal ......
  • Mervin v. F. T. C., 77-1204
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • December 4, 1978
  • Get Started for Free