Mitchell v. Boisseau, Civ. No. 3648.

Decision Date27 January 1954
Docket NumberCiv. No. 3648.
Citation118 F. Supp. 480
PartiesMITCHELL, Secretary of Labor v. BOISSEAU.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana

Stuart Rothman, Sol., Washington, D. C., Earl Street, Regional Atty., Harry Campbell, Jr., Asst. Regional Atty., Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff.

Rittenberg, Weinstein & Bronfin, Robert Weinstein, Henry F. Yoder, New Orleans, La., for defendant.

WRIGHT, District Judge.

The question presented is whether or not the defendant in the operation of his letter shop has violated the following provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S. C.A. § 201 et seq.: Sections 6 and 15 (a) (2) relating to minimum wages for employees, Sections 11(c) and 15(a) (5) relating to maintenance of proper work records, and Section 15(a) (1) relating to the shipment in interstate commerce of goods produced by employees paid less than the minimum wage. The issues of fact and law having come on to be heard on the pleadings and proofs of the parties and due deliberation having been had, the court now makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Findings of Fact.

1. Defendant, H. J. Boisseau, resides in the City of New Orleans, Orleans Parish, Louisiana, within the jurisdiction of this court, and at all times material hereto was the sole owner and proprietor of a place of business located in the said City of New Orleans.

2. At all times material hereto defendant was engaged in the operation of what, for convenience, is hereinafter referred to as a letter shop. The activities carried on in said place of business consisted of duplicating, mimeographing and otherwise printing or reproducing form letters, advertising circulars, and other advertising materials, affixing signatures to form letters, inserting names and addresses in form letters, addressing envelopes, inserting letters, advertising circulars and other advertising material in such envelopes, and stamping such envelopes, and mailing such envelopes and their content to the addresses, or delivering them to the person for whom said work was done, for such mailing.

3. Substantially all of the customers of the defendant for whom the work referred to hereinafter was performed were business and commercial concerns located in the City of New Orleans.

4. From on or about January 1, 1952, to on or about June 30, 1953, the defendant's gross income from the aforesaid business amounted to approximately $49,000, of which in excess of 78% was performed for ten customers. Approximately 35% of the total was performed for one customer and five-sixths of all work done for this customer was addressed to individuals without the State of Louisiana, so that during said period in excess of 30% of the defendant's total work was done in preparation of the mailing of form letters, advertising materials, etc., to points without the State of Louisiana.

5. The individuals who addressed form letters, addressed envelopes, and signed form letters, were compensated on a piece rate basis. Each employee was assigned all work by this defendant, performed said work in the defendant's establishment under defendant's supervision, delivered it to the defendant, and at all times was under the control of the defendant. No records of hours worked by the employees were maintained by the defendant.

6. Those employees engaged in addressing form letters and envelopes received $4.50 per thousand for form letters and $3.50 per thousand for envelopes. The employee engaged in affixing signatures to form letters received $1 per thousand. The rate of production which the said employees were able to maintain resulted in, at least, their frequently receiving less than 75 cents per hour.

7. At various times during the period involved herein the defendant employed individuals entitled by him "office boys". Such employees "stuffed" envelopes, stamped, sealed, and mailed envelopes containing the material hereinabove described and performed any...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Boisseau v. Mitchell, 15014.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • February 2, 1955
    ...enjoining him from further violating the minimum wage and record-keeping provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act,1 Mitchell v. Boisseau, D.C.La., 118 F.Supp. 480. The record discloses that the activities carried on in appellant's establishment consist of duplicating, mimeographing and ot......
  • Ben Kanowsky, Inc. v. Arnold, 16603.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • December 10, 1957
    ...was a "retail or service establishment" within the meaning of the exemption claimed. 11 Cf. 29 U.S.C.A. § 203. 12 Mitchell v. Boisseau, D.C., 118 F.Supp. 480. ...
  • Mitchell v. American Republic Insurance Co., 3-732.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Iowa
    • March 22, 1957
    ......        The case of Boisseau v. Mitchell, 5 Cir., 218 F.2d 734 is very similar. While it reversed the trial court, whose opinion ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT