Mitchell v. Mitchell
Decision Date | 27 June 1882 |
Citation | 12 N.W. 914,49 Mich. 68 |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Parties | MITCHELL v. MITCHELL. |
Where the court is equally divided, judgment will be affirmed.
Error to Kalamazoo.
O.W. Powers, for plaintiff in error.
Bown, Howard & Roos, for defendant in error.
In this case the court is equally divided and the judgment is therefore affirmed.
For the court.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Warren v. Warren
...state cannot maintain an action of this kind. The correctness of this holding is the only question to be determined. In Mitchell v. Mitchell, 49 Mich. 68, 12 N.W. 914, by an equal division of this court, the judgment of the court below against the wife was affirmed. In that case it appears ......
- Boydson v. Goodrich