Mitchell v. Warren

Decision Date31 May 1954
Docket NumberNo. 14689.,14689.
Citation213 F.2d 273
PartiesMITCHELL, Secretary of Labor v. WARREN.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Bessie Margolin, Asst. Sol. U. S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D. C., Stuart Rothman, Solicitor, E. Gerald Lamboley, Attorney, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D. C., Beverley R. Worrell, Regional Attorney, Birmingham, Ala., for appellant.

Julian Webb, Donalsonville, Ga., Vance Custer, Bainbridge, Ga., for appellee.

Before STRUM and RIVES, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District Judge.

STRUM, Circuit Judge.

This suit was brought by the Secretary of Labor on behalf of Jenkins J. Drake, an employee of defendant, to recover unpaid minimum wages alleged to be due by the defendant to said employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 206.

The Secretary appeals from a judgment entered upon a directed verdict for the employer, based upon the ground that the evidence did not show what portion of the employee's time was spent in interstate commerce, within the doctrine of Super-Cold Southwest Co. v. McBride, 5 Cir., 124 F.2d 90, the employee having spent part of his time in intrastate and part in interstate activities.

The appellee-employer is engaged in the business of buying and selling petroleum products, and related commodities, at Donalsonville, Georgia. The employee, Drake, is one of her truck drivers. Several times each week he drove a tank truck from Donalsonville, Georgia, to Panama City, Florida, to secure petroleum products for appellee, hauling such products either to the employer's place of business in Donalsonville, or directly to other points in Georgia or Alabama, where they were delivered to defendant's customers at those places. At other times he also made local deliveries in and around Donalsonville, Georgia.

The district court found that Drake made from one to five trips from Donalsonville, Georgia, to Panama City, Florida, and return, each week, and that "quite often" he also hauled loads from Panama City to various other points in Georgia and Alabama. Drake testified that his trips from Donalsonville to Panama City varied from three to eight per week, and that each round trip, a distance of approximately 100 miles, required from 6½ to 7 hours, including loading time at Panama City. Deliveries to places other than Donalsonville required even more time, since he returned to Donalsonville after each delivery.

The trial court found that between February 13, 1950, and January 6, 1951, the period covered by the complaint, Drake worked for defendant 3770¾ hours, for which he received $1686.00, which is an average of 80.2 hours per week, at the rate of 44.7 cents per hour, substantially less than the minimum fixed by Section 6 of the Act, as amended.

In directing the verdict, the trial judge was apparently of the opinion that the proof was insufficient because it failed to satisfy the requirement of the Super-Cold case, supra, that an employee working both interstate and intrastate must point out, with sufficient definiteness upon which to base a finding, what part of his work was in intrastate and what part was in interstate commerce. See also the concurring opinion in White Motor Co. v. Littleton, 5 Cir., 124 F.2d 92. The trial judge apparently construed this language as requiring precise and specific proof of how many hours the employee spent in each type of work, and that his recovery was limited to the number of hours the employee could specifically segregate and point out as spent in interstate driving.

In our opinion, the evidence in the present case regarding the employee's interstate activities is sufficient to bring him within the coverage of the Act...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Mitchell v. Strickland Transportation Company
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 11 de janeiro de 1956
    ...a claim under the Act. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 687-688, 66 S.Ct. 1187, 90 L.Ed. 1515, and see Mitchell v. Warren, 5 Cir., 213 F.2d 273. Reversed with 1 No. 15427: Baccus, the night watchman, is the use plaintiff against Strickland to recover unpaid statutory overt......
  • Wirtz v. Transportes Baxter, SA, Civ. A. No. 6040.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Panama Canal Zone
    • 12 de abril de 1966
    ...the benefits of the Act for the entire workweek when part of the work performed in any such workweek is covered by the Act. Mitchell v. Warren Oil Co., 213 F. 2d 273 (C.A.5); Wirtz v. Chain Singh, 243 F.Supp. 239 (C.Z.1965); 29 CFR 776.7(b), fn. 20; 29 CFR 4. Defendants have violated the pr......
  • Brewer's Inc. v. Wirtz
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 14 de abril de 1967
    ...the employees had unloaded. But it is not necessary that the interstate activities be identified with exactness. Cf. Mitchell v. Warren, 213 F.2d 273, 274 (5th Cir. 1954). Furthermore, these employees performed numerous activities in addition to the unloading of out-of-state goods which wou......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT