Mitchell v. Wisconsin
| Decision Date | 11 January 2019 |
| Docket Number | No. 18–6210.,18–6210. |
| Citation | 202 L.Ed.2d 642,139 S.Ct. 915 (Mem) |
| Parties | Gerald P. MITCHELL, petitioner, v. WISCONSIN. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin granted.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 cases
-
Mitchell v. Wisconsin
...N.W.2d 151, 155–156 (2018). The Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed Mitchell's convictions, and we granted certiorari, 586 U.S. ––––, 139 S.Ct. 915, 202 L.Ed.2d 642 (2019), to decide "[w]hether a statute authorizing a blood draw from an unconscious motorist provides an exception to the Fourth ......
-
State v. Key
...from the opinions of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, 383 Wis.2d 192, 914 N.W.2d 151, 154-55 (2018), cert. granted , ––– U.S. ––––, 139 S. Ct. 915, 202 L. Ed. 2d 642 (2019), and vacated and remanded , ––– U.S. ––––, 139 S. Ct. 2525, 204 L. Ed. 2d 1040 (2019), and the Court of Appeals of Wisc......
3 books & journal articles
-
Out for Blood: The Expansion of Exigent Circumstances and Erosion of the Fourth Amendment.
...(4.) Mitchell v. Wisconsin, 139 S. Ct. 2525, 2531 (2019). (5.) Id. (6.) Id. (7.) State v. Mitchell, 914 N.W.2d 151, 154, cert. granted, 139 S. Ct. 915 (2019), and vacated and remanded, 139 S. Ct. 2525 (8.) Id. (9.) Id. (10.) Id. (11.) Id. (12.) Id. (13.) Id. Congress conditions the award of......
-
Search and seizure
...withdrawn his or her [implied] consent, this provision was impliedly declared unconstitutional in Mitchell v. Wisconsin , 559 U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 915 (2019). The high Court granted certiorari in Mitchell to determine whether a similar statutory provision in Wisconsin’s implied consent statu......
-
Table of cases
...(1991) 54 Cal.3d 1041, §§1:21.5, 1:31.1 Mitchell v. Orr (1969) 268 Cal.App.2d 813, §§4:12.7, 4:15 Mitchell v. Wisconsin, 559 U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 915 (2019) Mize v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. (1975) 46 Cal.App.3d 436, 447, §5:44.5 Moberg v. Municipality of Anchorage (Alaska Ct.A......