Mizrahi v. Provident Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 98-2399.

Citation748 So.2d 1059
Decision Date15 December 1999
Docket NumberNo. 98-2399.,98-2399.
PartiesRalph MIZRAHI, Appellant, v. PROVIDENT LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)

Richard F. O'Brien, III, Miami, for appellant.

Shutts & Bowen, Edmund T. Henry, III, and Stacey L. Goldberg, Miami, for appellee.

Before LEVY, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Ralph Mizrahi, appeals from an adverse final judgment. We affirm for several reasons.

First, the record properly indicates that the insurer was required to carry the burden of proving that Mizrahi's total disability had ceased. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Fruchter, 283 So.2d 36, 37 (Fla.1973)(holding that where an insurance company has previously acknowledged the existence of a total disability and then has terminated the disability payments, the insurance company has the burden of proof to show that the total disability has ceased). Next, the trial court acted within its discretion in determining the order of presentation at trial. Johnson v. Mortham, 915 F.Supp. 1574, 1581 (N.D.Fla.1996)("[A] trial court has broad discretion to exercise control over the order of presentation at trial.... There will be no error in changing the order of presentation, so long as the court does not shift the ultimate burden of proof or persuasion to the other party...."). Lastly, there was substantial, competent evidence to support the trial court's determination, as trier of fact, that Mizrahi was no longer totally disabled as defined by the disability policy in question.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Shaps v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co., s. 98-5500
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • 16 Marzo 2001
    ...appellate courts in Florida have cited the Florida Supreme Court's opinion as precedent. See, e.g., Mizrahi v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co., 748 So.2d 1059, 1060 (Fla.App.3d Dist.1999); Principal Mut., 585 So.2d at 475. On the other hand, Florida courts-including the Supreme Court its......
  • Shaps v. Provident Life & Acc. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 29 Agosto 2002
    ...several lower appellate courts in Florida have cited this Court's opinion in Fruchter. See, e.g., Mizrahi v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co., 748 So.2d 1059, 1060 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Derius v. Allstate Indem. Co., 723 So.2d 271, 273 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Principal Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Ma......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT