Mo. Title Loans, Inc. v. Brewer
| Decision Date | 02 May 2011 |
| Docket Number | No. 10–1027.,10–1027. |
| Citation | 563 U.S. 971,179 L.Ed.2d 1184,131 S.Ct. 2875 (Mem) |
| Parties | MISSOURI TITLE LOANS, INC., petitioner, v. Beverly BREWER. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to Supreme Court of Missouri for further consideration in light of AT & T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011).
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Horizon Ventures of W. Va., Inc. v. Am. Bituminous Power Partners, L.P.
...v. Missouri Title Loans, Inc. , 323 S.W.3d 18, 22 (Mo. 2010) (cert. granted, judgment vacated on other grounds, 563 U.S. 971, 131 S.Ct. 2875, 179 L.Ed.2d 1184 (2011) ) ("Under Missouri law, unconscionability can be procedural, substantive or a combination of both.")); Mississippi (East Ford......
-
Brewer v. Mo. Title Loans, SC 90647.
...was to strike the entire arbitration agreement. The United States Supreme Court vacated Brewer in Missouri Title Loans, Inc. v. Brewer, ––– U.S ––––, 131 S.Ct. 2875, 179 L.Ed.2d 1184 (2011), and remanded the case to this Court for further consideration in light of AT & T Mobility, LLC v. Co......
-
Robinson v. Title Lenders, Inc.
...opinion in Brewer v. Missouri Title Loans, Inc., 323 S.W.3d 18 (Mo. banc 2010)(Brewer I), vacated, Missouri Title Loans, Inc. v. Brewer, ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 2875, 179 L.Ed.2d 1184 (2011),5 wherein this Court had found unconscionable and unenforceable a class waiver that was included in......
- David v. Metron Servs. Inc., 4:10CV02052 AGF
1 firm's commentaries
-
Life After Concepcion: Two Courts Reach Different Results
...a dispute. Id. In considering the impact of Concepcion, we examine two cases that the Supreme Court, at – U.S. – , 131 S.Ct. 2872, 179 L.Ed.2d 1184 (2011) (table), vacated and remanded following that decision. In Litman v. Cellco P'ship, 655 F.3d 225 (3d Cir. 2011), the governing arbitratio......