Mobil Oil Corp. v. Prive, 297-78
| Decision Date | 10 September 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 297-78,297-78 |
| Citation | 137 Vt. 370,406 A.2d 400 |
| Parties | MOBIL OIL CORPORATION v. Norman W. PRIVE. |
| Court | Vermont Supreme Court |
Monte & Monte, Barre, for plaintiff.
Norman W. Prive, pro se.
Before BARNEY, C. J., and DALEY, LARROW and HILL, JJ., and SMITH, J. (Retired), Specially Assigned.
In a collection action, the trial court rendered judgment for the defendant with respect to an indebtedness, undisputed as to liability or amount. He had sent, and plaintiff had cashed, a check for a lesser amount with a notation of payment of account in full. Curran v. Bray Wood Heel Co., 116 Vt. 21, 68 A.2d 712 (1949), was relied upon as supporting this result.
Curran deals with an obligation Disputed as to amount. Id. at 25, 68 A.2d at 715. The rule applicable to the facts found is stated in Crosby's Admrs. v. Naatz, 98 Vt. 226, 228-29, 126 A. 547, 548 (1924):
The payment of an amount less than that for which the debtor is liable does not constitute a valid accord and satisfaction, unless there was a Bona fide dispute or controversy as to the debtor's liability, or as to the amount due from him, or unless the damages are unliquidated. The requisite as a ground for compromise is a claim urged in good faith and with color of right. (Citations omitted.)
Accord, In re Estate of Boynton, 121 Vt. 98, 109, 148 A.2d 115, 122 (1959).
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for entry of judgment for plaintiff for $1,100.58 with interest and costs in each court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Miller v. Miller, 04-187.
-
US FOR USE OF LAS VEGAS BLDG. MATER. INC. v. Bernadot
...of an offer of an accord. Teledyne Mid-America Corporation v. HOH Corporation, 486 F.2d 987 (9th Cir.1973); Mobil Oil Corp. v. Prive, 137 Vt. 370, 406 A.2d 400 (1979); See Hall v. Time Ins. Co., 854 F.2d 440 (11th Cir.1988). However, acceptance is effective only when the recipient of the ch......
-
Duke v. Duke, 282-80
... ... v. Summit Realty Corp., 137 Vt. 535, 536, 409 A.2d 559, 559 (1979) ... Since ... ...
-
Larson v. Candlish, 83-066
...as to the amount due. See Adams v. B.P.C., Inc., 143 Vt. 308, 309-10, 466 A.2d 1170, 1171-72 (1983), and Mobil Oil Corp. v. Prive, 137 Vt. 370, 370-71, 406 A.2d 400, 400-01 (1979) (acceptance of amount tendered can operate as an accord and satisfaction only for disputed or unliquidated debt......