Mobley v. Baptist Hospital of Gadsden, Inc.
| Decision Date | 26 July 1978 |
| Citation | 361 So.2d 16 |
| Parties | Sandra MOBLEY v. BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF GADSDEN, INC., a corporation. Civ. 1508. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Civil Appeals |
Jack Floyd of Floyd, Keener & Cusimano, Gadsden, for appellant.
Buford L. Copeland of Copeland & Copeland, Gadsden, for appellee.
The Baptist Hospital of Gadsden sued the mother and father of a minor child. The hospital claimed the mother and father owed the hospital for services performed on behalf of the minor.
The circuit court, without a jury, found in favor of the hospital and entered a judgment against both the mother and father. The mother appeals from that judgment. The father makes no appeal.
As we perceive able counsel for the mother's argument in brief, it is his contention that the law of Alabama provides that the primary responsibility for support of a minor child is the duty of the father and the mother has no duty to support. The mother therefore contends that the trial court could not, as a matter of law, enter a judgment against the mother. We disagree and affirm.
The record before this court reveals that the mother and father were divorced in 1971. The divorce decree in pertinent part provided that the primary custody of the minor child was to be with the mother. The father was to have custody on certain weekends during the month. The husband was required to provide each month a certain amount for child support. No specific provision was made with reference to medical expenses.
While the child was with the father on a weekend as provided in the decree of divorce, he broke his arm. The child was taken by the father to the plaintiff-hospital. Services were performed by the hospital. The father informed the hospital to bill the mother for the services performed. The amount of this bill was slightly in excess of $200.
Both the mother and father thereafter refused to pay the hospital's bill. The hospital sued both the mother and father jointly.
The Etowah County Court entered judgment against the mother and father. The mother appealed to the circuit court. The circuit court entered a judgment against both the mother and father and, as indicated above, the mother has appealed to this court.
We would note at this point that both counsel for the mother and father have favored this court with concise and well written briefs. We would further note that the lawsuit was tried on an agreed statement of facts which provide little detail.
Suffice it to say that in this...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
University of South Alabama v. Patterson
...medical necessaries of the children. See Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Bolding, 465 So.2d 409 (Ala.Civ.App.1984); Mobley v. Baptist Hospital, Inc., 361 So.2d 16 (Ala.Civ.App.1978); Osborn v. Weatherford, 27 Ala.App. 258, 170 So. 95 Among the stipulated facts which are set forth in the trial c......