Mock v. Stultz

Decision Date28 January 1932
Docket Number13,966
CitationMock v. Stultz, 97 Ind.App. 138, 179 N.E. 561 (Ind. App. 1932)
PartiesMOCK v. STULTZ ET AL
CourtIndiana Appellate Court

Rehearing denied April 8, 1932.

Transfer denied June 7, 1933.

From Wells Circuit Court; A. W. Hamilton, Judge.

Claim by George Mock as guardian of Martha A. Yarger against Morris E. Stultz as receiver of the Wells County Bank and another.From an allowance of the claim as an unpreferred claim, the claimant appealed.

Affirmed.

George Mock, for appellant.

Simmons & Simmons, for appellee.

OPINION

NEAL, J.

The appellant filed his claim with the receiver of the Wells County Bank, which claim was subsequently transferred to the trial docket of the Wells Circuit Court.Upon trial, the court made a special finding of facts, stated its conclusions of law thereon and rendered judgment accordingly.The judgment was to the effect that there is due and owing to George Mock, guardian of Martha A. Yarger the sum of $ 249.61 and that the same is allowed as a common claim in the receivership.

The errors relied upon for reversal challenge each of the conclusions of law, two in number, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial.The causes under the motion for the new trial are: (1)The decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence; (2) the decision is contrary to law; and (3) the assessment of the amount of recovery is erroneous, being too small.

The special finding of facts present salient facts as follows: That the Wells County Bank at Bluffton, Indiana, was, pursuant to its charter, engaged in the banking business until the expiration of its charter on June 26, 1928; that thereafter a new corporation was organized under the laws of the State of Indiana, such corporation being known as Wells County Bank, and being a bank of deposit, with its place of business at Bluffton, Indiana; that the new corporation took over the assets of the first Wells County Bank; that the Wells County Bank continued from the time of incorporation and organization to conduct and operate a general banking business, until 3 o'clock p. m. on February 11, 1929, and never again thereafter was the last named bank open for the transaction of banking business; that thereafter appellee was appointed receiver of the named bank by the consideration of the Wells Circuit Court on complaint filed by the State of Indiana on the relation of Luther F. Symons, bank commissioner of the State of Indiana and duly qualified as such receiver and took full charge of the assets of the institution; that on September 12, 1904, in cause No. 8,120 of the Wells Circuit Court, one Martha A. Yarger was found to be a person of unsound mind and incapable of managing her estate and that there should be a guardian appointed for her and judgment was entered accordingly; that thereafter, on July 18, 1905, one George Mock, upon petition filed, was duly appointed guardian of the estate of the named Martha A. Yarger and duly qualified as such guardian and since the last mentioned date, continuously and up to the present time has been the duly qualified and acting guardian of Martha A. Yarger; that on October 26, 1928, there was issued in the name of Martha A. Yarger, by the Wells County Bank, two certificates of deposit, each of the following tenor, except the amounts not being the same; the first in the sum of $ 230.49, and the second in the sum of $ 14.17: "Capital $ 100,000, State of Indiana.Surplus $ 75,000.Certificate of Deposit.The Wells County Bank.No. 253103.Incorporated1888. 71-351.$ 230.49.Bluffton, Indiana.Oct. 26, 1928.Mrs. Martha Yarger has deposited in this bank, Wells Co. Bank, $ 230 and 49 cents.Dollars in current funds, payable to the order of self, on the return of this certificate properly endorsed, duplicate unpaid.Interest at 4 per cent per annum if left six months or one year and payable for six months or one year only.After Sept. 20-28.Not subject to check.Safety Deposit Boxes $ 2.00 a year.R. S. Morrow Vice-President, Cashier;" that the named R. S. Morrow was, on October 26, 1928, and continuously thereafter up to and including February 11, 1929, the vice-president of the Wells County Bank; that Morrow knew and was personally acquainted with Martha Yarger, Martha A. Yarger and Mrs. Martha A. Yarger as one and the same person and also knew at the time he issued the certificate of deposit that she was a person of unsound mind and that on October 29, 1928, and for several years prior thereto, Morrow knew that the George Mock, heretofore mentioned, was the duly appointed and qualified and acting guardian of Martha A. Yarger; that George Mock did not know that the certificates of deposit had been issued in the name of Martha A. Yarger; nor did he know that she had any funds or money deposited in Wells County Bank until the closing of the bank a short time prior to April 25, 1929, when her son, Jacob Yarger, found the certificates in the possession of Martha Yarger; that on December 15, 1927, there was issued to George Mock, guardian of Martha A. Yarger, a certificate of deposit for $ 5.

The conclusion of law No. 1 is as follows: "That there is due and owing to George Mock, guardian of Martha A. Yarger, the sum of $ 249.61 as shown by said certificate of deposit. . . and that the same is hereby allowed as a common claim and that Morris E. Stultz as receiver of Wells County Bank is hereby ordered to pay the same as a common claim in the receivership of Wells County Bank."Conclusion of law No. 2 was that plaintiff recover the costs laid out and expended by him.

Appellee states the well known rule of law that where a special...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Estate of Fanning, In re
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • 28 Agosto 1975
    ...v. Straus, supra, 107 Ind. at 97, 6 N.E. at 125. See also DeVay v. Dunlap (1893), 7 Ind.App. 690, 35 N.E. 195; Mock v. Stultz (1932), 97 Ind.App. 138, 179 N.E. 561 and Note, 8 U.Val.L.Rev. 140 (1973), n. ' The certificates of deposit purchased by Wildus Fanning were third party beneficiary ......
  • Fanning's Estate, In re
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 3 Septiembre 1974
    ...v. Straus, supra, 107 Ind. at 97, 6 N.E. at 125. See also DeVay v. Dunlap (1893), 7 Ind.App. 690, 35 N.E. 195; Mock v. Stultz (1932), 97 Ind.App. 138, 179 N.E. 561 and Note, 8 Va.L.Rev. 140 n. 30 The certificates of deposit purchased by Wildus Fanning were third party beneficiary contracts ......
  • Rottger v. First-Merchants National Bank of Lafayette
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 31 Enero 1933
    ... ... Sandusky (1930), 91 Ind.App. 200, 170 N.E. 792; ... Allen & Steen, etc., Co. v. Cook (1931), 93 ... Ind.App. 682, 173 N.E. 460; Mock v. Stultz ... (1933), 96 Ind.App. 138, 179 N.E. 561; Crowder v ... Abbott, supra ...          Among ... leading cases in other ... ...
  • Rottger v. First-Merchants' Nat. Bank of Lafayette
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 31 Enero 1933
    ...v. Sandusky (1930) 91 Ind. App. 200, 170 N. E. 792;Allen & Steen, etc., Co. v. Cook (1930) 93 Ind. App. 682, 173 N. E. 460;Mock v. Stultz (Ind. App.) 179 N. E. 561, decided January 28, 1932; Crowder v. Abbott, supra. Among leading cases in other jurisdictions where the same rule has been ad......
  • Get Started for Free