Moir v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority, No. 89-3275
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Before KEITH, JONES and BOGGS; KEITH |
| Citation | 895 F.2d 266 |
| Parties | 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2528, 58 USLW 2507, 114 Lab.Cas. P 11,891 Michael T. MOIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY; Amalgamated Transit Union, Local # 268, Defendants-Appellees. |
| Docket Number | No. 89-3275 |
| Decision Date | 06 February 1990 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
647 practice notes
-
Moore v. It's All Good Auto Sales, Inc., No. 11–2758–STA–cgc.
...the party asserting jurisdiction bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction. Moir v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth., 895 F.2d 266, 269 (6th Cir.1990). Further, “the plaintiff, as the party invoking federal subject matter jurisdiction, has the burden of persuading the court that......
-
Sheldon v. Vilsack, Case Number 11-10487
...Cir. 1986). A plaintiff must demonstrate jurisdiction in order to survive the motion. Moir v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth., 895 F.2d 266, 269 (6th Cir. 1990). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) allows a party to move to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim upon......
-
Hobbs v. Faulkner, Case No. 1:17-cv-441
...Corp., 298 U.S. 178, 182-83 (1935); Thomson v. Gaskill, 315 U.S.Page 4 442 (1942); Moir v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority, 895 F.2d 266 (6th Cir. 1990); 5A Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, Civil 2d §1350 (1990). A federal court is further obliged to note lack......
-
United States v. Scherer, Case No. 2:14-cv-452
...City of Heath, Ohio v. Ashland Oil, Inc., 834 F.Supp. 971, 975 (S.D.Ohio 1993) (citing Moir v. Greater Cleveland Reg'l Transit Auth., 895 F.2d 266, 269 (6th Cir. 1990)); Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). Plaintiff bears the burden of proving jurisdiction when subject matter jurisdiction is challenged ......
Request a trial to view additional results
640 cases
-
Moore v. It's All Good Auto Sales, Inc., No. 11–2758–STA–cgc.
...the party asserting jurisdiction bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction. Moir v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth., 895 F.2d 266, 269 (6th Cir.1990). Further, “the plaintiff, as the party invoking federal subject matter jurisdiction, has the burden of persuading the court that......
-
Steele v. United States, Case No. 1:19-cv-705
...motion to dismiss. Nichols v. Muskingum Coll., 318 F.3d 674, 677 (6th Cir. 2003) (citing Moir v. Greater Cleveland Reg'l Transit Auth., 895 F.2d 266, 269 (6th Cir.1990)). Documents filed by pro se plaintiffs are "to be liberally construed" and pro se complaints "must be held to less stringe......
-
In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litig., Case No. 2:11-cv-1016
...is on the party asserting jurisdiction. Thomson v. Gaskill, 315 U.S. 442 (1942); Moir v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority, 895 F.2d 266 (6th Cir. 1990); 5A Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, Civil 2d §1350 (1990). A facial attack is proper under rule 12(b)(1) and......
-
Sheldon v. Vilsack, Case Number 11-10487
...Cir. 1986). A plaintiff must demonstrate jurisdiction in order to survive the motion. Moir v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth., 895 F.2d 266, 269 (6th Cir. 1990). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) allows a party to move to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim upon......
Request a trial to view additional results