Moldwood Corporation v. Stutts
Decision Date | 14 April 1969 |
Docket Number | 26571.,No. 26546,26546 |
Citation | 410 F.2d 351 |
Parties | MOLDWOOD CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. A. B. STUTTS, Defendant-Appellant. The CITY NATIONAL BANK OF TUSCALOOSA, a National Banking Association, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. A. B. STUTTS, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
W. D. Partlow, Jr., Tuscaloosa, Ala., Robert P. Upchurch, Livingston, Ala., for appellant.
Ira D. Pruitt, Pruitt & Pruitt, Livingston, Ala., H. Vann Waldrop, Hubbard & Waldrop, Tuscaloosa, Ala., for appellee.
Before THORNBERRY, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.
In No. 26546, Moldwood Corporation, claiming a default, sued Stutts, as endorser on two promissory notes, for the remaining principal due, with interest and attorney's fees.
In No. 26571, the City National Bank of Tuscaloosa, claiming a default, sued Stutts, as endorser on two promissory notes, for the remaining principal due, with interest and attorney's fees.
Both cases were docketed for trial on April 22, 1968, in the Western Division of the District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, but were continued to April 25, 1968.Counsel for Stutts was engaged in another trial from April 25 to April 30, 1968, in the Northeastern Division of the same court.Both of Stutts' cases were called for trial on April 25, 26 and April 29, 1968, without response from Stutts' counsel.On the latter date the District Courtsua sponte entered a default judgment for Moldwood and The City National Bank and submitted the question of damages in each case to a jury.Upon the jury's verdict judgment was entered in No. 26546 in favor of Moldwood and against Stutts for $27,109.02, and in No. 26571 in favor of The City National Bank of Tuscaloosa and against Stutts for $16,778.55.
On May 8, 1968, Stutts moved to set aside the judgment in each case.Both motions were denied on June 10, 1968.These appeals ensued.1
Counsel for Stutts complains that he could not be in two divisions of the same court at the same time.Obviously, no court could expect this.There is nothing in the record, however, to show that the Western Division Judge knew of this situation.
We nevertheless would be quickly persuaded to give Stutts relief if, upon his motion to set aside the judgment, he had given the District Court even a hint of a suggestion that he had a meritorious defense in either case.This he utterly failed to do.
It is universally recognized as an essential to the obtaining of relief from a default judgment entered with jurisdiction that there...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Pure Fresh, LLC v. Liaison Can./U.S. Logistics (USA) Corp.
...merit." Griffin IT Media, Inc. v. Intelligentz Corp., No. 07-80535-CIV, 2008 WL 162754, at *3 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 16, 2008) (quoting Keegel v. Key West & Caribbean Trading Co., 627 F.2d 372, 374 (D.C. Cir. 1980);
Moldwood Corp. v. Stutts, 410 F.2d 351, 352 (5th Cir. 1969)). In addition, little prejudice will result from setting aside the Clerk's defaults. First, Plaintiff's argument with respect to incurring additional attorneys' fees lacks merit, especially where additional... -
Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Thames
...present a meritorious defense, defendants must make a "clear and specific showing ... by [a] definite recitation of facts" that they have a valid defense. Jenkens & Gilchrist, 542 F.3d at 121 (citing
Moldwood Corp. v. Stutts, 410 F.2d 351, 352 (5th Cir. 1969)). Their "'defense is measured not by whether there is a likelihood that it will carry the day, but whether the evidence submitted, if proven at trial, would constitute a complete defense.'" Id. (quoting... -
Seven Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi
...injustice is clear when the movant is unable to show the existence of a defense of sufficient merit to indicate the possibility that the outcome would differ upon retrial, 22 Wright & Miller, supra, § 2698, at 346; see
Moldwood Corp. v. Stutts, 410 F.2d 351, 352 (5th Cir. 1969), and that he had no fair opportunity to present that defense in the proceeding below. We believe the appellants in this case have shown both the existence of a sufficiently meritorious defense and the absence of... -
Regent Ins. Co. v. Findlay Roofing & Constr., Inc.
...statements are insufficient to establish a meritorious defense; the movant mustpresent a factual basis for its claim." Turner Broad. Sys., Inc. v. Sanyo Elec. Inc., 33 B.R. 996, 1002 (N.D. Ga., 1983) (citing
Moldwood Corp. v. Stutts, 410 F.2d 351, 352 (5th Cir. 1969)). For these reasons Findlay has failed to carry its burden to show the Court any meritorious defenses. Since Findlay does not have a meritorious defense, Regent will be prejudiced if the default is set aside. Turner...