Mollendorf v. State
Decision Date | 07 October 1946 |
Docket Number | 7288 |
Citation | 67 Idaho 151,173 P.2d 519 |
Parties | MOLLENDORF v. STATE |
Court | Idaho Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied October 23, 1946.
Appeal from District Court, Eighth District, Benewah County; A. L Morgan, Presiding Judge.
Order reversed and cause remanded with instructions.
Wm. D Keeton, of St. Maries, for appellants.
A check is not a payment of an obligation. Gary v. Boundary County, 49 Idaho 589.
Delay in issuing a commitment does not deprive a court of jurisdiction. 24 C.J.S., Criminal Law, § 1999, page 1244; State v. Piper, Sheriff, 103 Kan. 794, 176 P 626, Syl. 3; Cloud v. Horning, 133 Kan. 763, 3 P.2d 461; Miller v. Evans, 115 Iowa 101, 88 N.W. 198, 56 L.R.A. 101, 91 Am.St.Rep. 143.
Provisions governing the writ of habeas corpus are statutory. I.C.A. § 19-4308; Allen v. Williams, 31 Idaho 309, 171 P. 493; I.C.A. §§ 19-4311, 19-4312, 19-4313, 19-4314, 19-4315.
J. H. Felton, of Moscow, for respondent.
The phrase "unlawful traffic in alcoholic liquor" does not designate any crime within the Idaho statutes. 1939 Session Laws, Pages 460 and 465 to 484; Purpose -- Sec. 102, page 467; Traffic Defined -- Sec. 203 (b), p. 468; Transportation -- Sec. 805, page 477; Permissive Possession, 804-A, p. 460; Penal Provisions -- Sections 901 to 909, pages 479 to 481; Liquor Nuisances -- pages 481 to 484.
A check accepted as payment extinguishes a debt or sentence, whether or not the check is actually paid and even though payment is stopped. Pridgen v. James, 168 Ga. 770, 149 S.E. 48; Howard v. Tucker, 12 Ga.App. 353, 77 S.E. 191; Cook & Bernheimer v. Hagedorn, 82 Ind.App. 444, 131 N.E. 788; Zacharias v. Donaldson, 188 Mich. 443, 154 N.W. 139; American Exch. Nat. Bank v. Superior Court, 29 Cal.App. 8, 154 P. 279.
September 4, 1945, Helen I. Mollendorf was charged in a criminal complaint filed in the Probate Court of Benewah County, as follows:
On the same date a warrant of arrest was duly issued by the probate judge and delivered to Mansfield Shepherd, directing said sheriff to forthwith arrest the within named Helen I. Mollendorf "and bring her before me at my office in the town of St. Maries, in said County, or in the case of my absence or inability to act, before the nearest or most accessible Magistrate in this County." Whereupon Helen I. Mollendorf was duly arrested, by execution of said warrant, on the 4th day of September, 1945, and taken before the probate judge. Thereafter she was duly arraigned, informed of her legal rights, the nature of the offense charged against her, and she entered her plea of guilty to the offense, waived the time for the pronouncement of sentence, whereupon the court pronounced sentence and entered the following judgment:
"Whereupon, the court being advised in the premises finds that you, Helen I. Mollendorf, are guilty of the charge of unlawful traffic in alcoholic liquor as you have confessed you are guilty, and it is the Judgment and Sentence of this court that you pay a fine of $ 250.00 and that you further pay the costs and disbursements of this action, assessed in the sum of $ 5.40, and that in lieu of payment of such fine and costs, that you be confined in the Benewah County jail one day for each $ 2.00 of said fine and costs until the same have been fully paid. * * *"
Thereafter the following commitment was issued:
Upon the pronouncement of the judgment and before the execution of the commitment, Helen I. Mollendorf delivered to the probate judge a check for $ 255.40, fine and costs. September 13, 1945, the check was presented to the bank for payment, and payment refused, the bank having been notified by Helen I. Mollendorf to stop payment on the check. Thereafter a second commitment was duly issued, whereupon Helen I. Mollendorf was confined in the county jail to be there detained until the payment of the fine and costs heretofore referred to.
Respondent filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, for Benewah County, in which she alleged, inter alia, as grounds for the issuance of said writ that her imprisonment was illegal: (1) That the criminal complaint does not charge the commission of any crime; (2) that the judgment does not find petitioner guilty of any crime; (3) that the fine and costs, if any were due under such proceedings, were paid by check, and, when such check was accepted, constituted payment and settlement in full of such judgment, and that the commitment issued thereafter was illegally issued upon a judgment which was already fully settled and paid; (4) that the furnishing of whiskey to the said Helen I. Mollendorf by the sheriff after her arrest rendered void all future proceedings thereunder until such time as petitioner was fully recovered from the effects thereof.
September 8, 1945, an order was issued by Hon. Oliver C. Wilson, District Judge, directing the clerk to issue a writ of habeas corpus in pursuance of the petition, returnable before Hon. A. L. Morgan, District Judge, designated to preside as Judge of the Eighth Judicial District, in the courtroom at Coeur d'Alene, Kootenai County, at 10:30 a. m., Friday, November 16, 1945; said writ was served upon the sheriff of Benewah County November 13, 1945, commanding him to "have the body of Helen I. Mollendorf, by you imprisoned and detained, * * * together with the time and cause of such imprisonment and detention, before the Honorable A. L. Morgan, District Judge, * * * in the court room of said court in Coeur d'Alene, * * * on the 16th day of November, 1945, at 10:30 o'clock A.M., * * * and have you then and there this writ, with your return endorsed thereon or annexed thereto." November 14, 1945, the sheriff filed his answer and return to the writ. November 16, 1945, the matter came on for hearing before Judge Morgan; at the conclusion of the hearing counsel was given time within which to file additional briefs and "that in the meantime, pending the final submission of the case the defendant will be released upon her own recognizance, she at all times to hold herself amenable to the order of the court." December 15, 1945, Judge Morgan made the following order:
From which order this appeal was prosecuted.
There are other immaterial facts included in the record which we deem unnecessary to refer to.
In limine, it might be well to call attention to the case of State v. Basinger, 46 Idaho 775, 778, 271 P. 325, 326, wherein the following language is used:
See, also, State v. Farnsworth, 51 Idaho 768, 10 P.2d 295; State v....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Owens
...to protect himself against a subsequent prosecution based on commission of the same acts. State v. McKeehan, supra; Mollendorf v. State, 67 Idaho 151, 173 P.2d 519 (1946). The information filed against defendant Owens in district court adequately sets out the nature and circumstances of the......
-
State v. Martinez
...as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended.' State v. Basinger, 46 Idaho 775, 271 P. 325; Mollendorf v. State, 67 Idaho 151, 173 P.2d 519; State v. Carpenter, 85 Idaho 232, 378 P.2d 188; State v. McGlochlin, 85 Idaho 459, 381 P.2d This language is predicated upon......
-
State v. Darrah
...Hix, 58 Idaho 730, 78 P.2d 1003 (1938). Nonprejudicial error does not constitute ground for reversal. I.C. § 19-3702; Mollendorf v. State, 67 Idaho 151, 173 P.2d 519 (1946); State v. McLennan, 40 Idaho 286, 231 P. 718 (1925). Defendants also contend that instruction 19 as given by the court......
-
Hess v. State
...goods, merchandise or commodities for an equivalent in goods or money. People v. Gwyer, 7 A.D.2d 711, 179 N.Y.S.2d 987; Mollendorf v. State, 67 Idaho 151, 173 P.2d 519; People v. Dunford, 207 N.Y. 17, 100 N.E. 433. The evidence as presented at trial reflects that the defendants operated, ma......