Monahan v. State, 79-33
| Decision Date | 04 November 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 79-33,79-33 |
| Citation | 390 So.2d 756 |
| Parties | Michael MONAHAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Markus & Winter and Laurie S. Silvers, Miami, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Susan Minor, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY and SCHWARTZ, JJ., and CHAPPELL, BILL G., Associate Judge.
Monahan appeals his conviction following a trial before the Court without a jury and challenges the denial of a motion to suppress tangible evidence, to-wit: cocaine, seized without a warrant.
Officers McGavock and Magdalena of the Dade County Public Safety Department were on duty at Miami International Airport randomly looking for persons who matched the "drug courier profile." Monahan was first observed just before he entered the terminal building and surveillance continued while he checked a bag and started walking to the concourse. The officers walked up beside him and asked Monahan if they could talk to him. Monahan agreed, and upon the officers' request, he produced his driver's license and his airline ticket, both bearing his name. Detective Magdalena stated that they were concerned that the contents of his luggage might contain narcotics and asked Monahan if he would object to their looking in his luggage. He replied that he didn't mind the officers looking, but he had already checked the larger bag with the airline. Officer McGavock testified that Monahan said it would be all right to go get the bag from the airline which Defendant denied. The tote bag being carried by Monahan was searched and Detective Magdalena appeared with the suitcase he retrieved from the airline. Monahan denied that the suitcase was his whereupon the officers informed Monahan that he was being detained, advised him of his rights and handcuffed him. The officers advised Monahan that they intended looking into the suitcase, considering it to be abandoned property. They transported Monahan to the police station at the west side of the airport where the suitcase was forced open and found to contain packets of cocaine.
It is not necessary in this case to review the cases on temporary "drug courier profile" stops in airports. 1
The initial stop of Monahan was based solely on the observation that he was looking around before entering the terminal building and continued to do so while checking his suitcase. The officers had nothing more than bare suspicion which, without his consent, would not have constituted a reasonable basis for the seizure of his person. 2
Monahan produced identification which coincided...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Cosby
...conduct. State v. Harbison (2007), 141 N.M. 392, 156 P.3d 30; United States v. Beck (5th Cir., 1979), 602 F.2d 726; Monahan v. State (Fla.App. 1980), 390 So.2d 756; LaFave, Search and Seizure (2004), 683-684, Section {¶ 33} As we previously noted, defendant's act in discarding the baggie of......
-
State of Ohio v. TAYLOR
...conduct. State v. Harbison (2007), 141 N.M. 392, 156 P.3d 30; United States v. Beck (5th Cir., 1979), 602 F.2d 726; Monahan v. State (Fla.App.1980), 390 So.2d 756; LaFave, Search and Seizure (2004), 683-684, Section 2.6(b). "* * * The test for voluntary abandonment involves a determination ......
-
O'Shaughnessy v. State
...denied, 444 U.S. 969, 100 S.Ct. 461, 62 L.Ed.2d 383 (1979) with Martinez v. State, 414 So.2d 301 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Monahan v. State, 390 So.2d 756 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); United States v. Beck, 602 F.2d 726 (5th Cir. 1979); Commonwealth v. Harris, 491 Pa. 402, 421 A.2d 199 (1980); Commonweal......
-
State v. Perez, 89-2024
...defendant under section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1987). The court granted the motion to suppress on the authority of Monahan v. State, 390 So.2d 756 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), review denied, 399 So.2d 1146 (Fla.1981), and Spann v. State, 529 So.2d 825 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), reasoning that the aban......