Monongahela Navigation Co v. United States
Decision Date | 27 March 1893 |
Docket Number | No. 722,722 |
Citation | 13 S.Ct. 622,37 L.Ed. 463,148 U.S. 312 |
Parties | MONONGAHELA NAVIGATION CO. v. UNITED STATES |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Proceedings by the United States to acquire a lock and dam of the Monongahela Navigation Company, situated on the Monongahela river. From the judgment awarding compensation the navigation company appeals. Reversed.
Statement by Mr. Justice BREWER:
By the act of August 11, 1888, (25 St. p. 411,) congress, among other things, enacted:
'The secretary of war be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to negotiate for and purchase, at a cost not to exceed $161,733.13, lock and dam number seven, otherwise known as the 'upper lock and dam,' and its appurtenances, of the Monongahela Navigation Company, a corporation organized under the laws of Pennsylvania, which lock and dam number seven and its appurtenances constitute a part of the improvements in water communication in the Monongahela river, between Pittsburgh, in the state of Pennsylvania, and a point at or near Morgantown, in the state of West Virginia. And the sum of $161,733.13, or so much thereof as may be necessary, is hereby appropriated out of any moneys in the treasury not otherwise appropriated for consummating said purchase, the same to be paid on the warrant of the secretary of war, upon full and absolute conveyance to the United States of the said lock and dam number seven, and its appurtenances, of the said Monongahela Navigation Company.
The effort at a voluntary purchase failing, on December 1, 1888, proceedings of condemnation were commenced in the circuit court of the United States for the western district of Pennsylvania. Viewers were appointed, who reported the value of the lock and dam number seven to be $209,393.52. Such valuation did not take into account the franchise of the company to collect tolls. An appeal was taken, as provided by the statutes of Pennsylvania, which appeal gave the right to a trial de novo, according to the course of the common law. A jury having been waived, the matter was tried before the court, the navigation company being the plaintiff, as to the question of amount of compensation. These facts appeared on the trial.
'In 1836, the state of Pennsylvania incorporated and by acts in that and subsequent years granted to the Monongahela Navigation Company the right 'to enter upon the said river Monongahela and upon the lands on either side, and to use the rocks, stone, gravel, or earth which may be found thereon in the constructions of their works, * * * and to form and make, erect and set up any dams, locks, or any other device whatsoever which they shall think most fit and convenient, to make a complete slack-water navigation between the points herein mentioned, to wit, the city of Pittsburgh and the Virginia state line.'
'The Monongahela river rises in the mountains of West Virginia, flows northwardly through Pennsylvania to Pittsburgh, where it forms a junction with the Allegheny and Ohio rivers.
'In pursuance of its charter, the navigation company, between 1841 and the present time, has constructed in said river seven locks and dams, which together now carry the slackwater navigation as far as the West Virginia state line.
'The construction of the lock and dam No. 7, the property attempted to be appropriated in this proceeding, by the Monongahela Navigation Company, was begun in the year 1882 and completed in 1884, being the last one built, and completing the company's improvements in the state of Pennsylvania.
'The work was commenced under the following circumstances:
'It was provided by an act of the legislature of Pennsylvania, constituting a supplement to the company's charter, approved April 8, 1857, that whenever the construction of sufficient locks and dams to extend the slack water on the Monongahela river from the Pennsylvania state line to Morgantown, in Virginia, shall have been commenced, it shall be the duty of the Monongahela Navigation Company to commence the construction of lock and dam No. 7 in such manner and on such plan as will extend the navigation from its present terminus to the Virginia state line, and complete the same simultaneously with the completion of the work extending to Morgantown.'
On March 3, 1881, congress passed an act, (21 St. p. 471,) among other things appropriating $25,000 for improving the Monongahela river in West Virginia and Pennsylvania, with this proviso:
'But this sum shall not be expended until the Monongahela Navigation Company shall have undertaken in good faith the building of lock and dan number seven at Jacob's creek, and until said company shall, in manner satisfactory to the secretary of war, give assurance of their ability and purpose to complete the same.'
After the passage of this act, and on March 24, 1881, Col. William E. Merrill, the engineer and officer in charge of the public works of the United States on the river Monongahela, addressed this letter to the navigation company:
'U. S. Engineer's Office, Customhouse, Cincinnati, O., March 24, 1881.
and that you will give the secretary of war satisfactory assurance of your ability and purpose to complete it. I would therefore suggest that it might be useful for your secretary to communicate at once to the secretary of war such facts as to the financial resources of the company and its intentions about number seven as will satisfy him on the points specially left to his discretion and unlock the appropriation so that it may be used this summer. Respectfully, your obedient servant, Wm. E. Merrill, Maj. Eng'rs & B'v't Col.'
Whereupon, and on April 6, 1881, the following resolutions were passed by the navigation company, notice of which was given to the secretary of war:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Community Redevelopment Agency v. Abrams
...Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. United States (1923) 261 U.S. 299, 304, 43 S.Ct. 354, 67 L.Ed. 664; Monongahela Navig'n Co. v. United States (1892) 148 U.S. 312, 327, 13 S.Ct. 622, 37 L.Ed. 463; County of Los Angeles v. Ortiz (1971) 6 Cal.3d 141, 145, 98 Cal.Rptr. 454, 490 P.2d 1142), it is the co......
-
United States v. Crary
...76, 33 S. Ct. 667, 57 L. Ed. 1063; Bauman v. Ross, 167 U. S. 548, 587, 17 S. Ct. 966, 42 L. Ed. 270; Monongahala Navigation Co. v. U. S., 148 U. S. 312, 341, 13 S. Ct. 622, 37 L. Ed. 463; R. & M. Railroad Co. v. Humphreys, 90 Va. 425, 436, 18 S. E. 901; Richmond & P. Electric R. Co. v. Seab......
-
Columbia Venture, LLC v. Richland Cnty.
...a full and just equivalent [ ] be returned to him.’ ” Id. at 147–48, 98 S.Ct. 2646 (quoting Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United States, 148 U.S. 312, 325, 13 S.Ct. 622, 37 L.Ed. 463 (1893) ). Considering the character of the County's floodplain development restrictions, we find the importa......
-
Sebastian Bridge Dist. v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.
... ... 345 SEBASTIAN BRIDGE DIST. v. MISSOURI PAC. R. CO. No. 6051.United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.August 9, 1923 [292 F. 346] ... under some circumstances, constitute such (Monongahela ... Navigation Co. v. United States, 148 U.S. 312, 13 ... Sup.Ct. 622, ... ...
-
VESTED RIGHTS, "FRANCHISES," AND THE SEPARATION OF POWERS.
...was correct. (222) W. River Bridge Co. v. Dix, 47 U.S. (6 How.) 507, 534 (1848). (223) Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United States, 148 U.S. 312, 327 (224) SEE, E.G., 1 ALLEN RIPLEY FOOTE, THE LAW OF INCORPORATED COMPANIES OPERATING UNDER MUNICIPAL FRANCHISES, SUCH AS ILLUMINATING GAS COMPA......
-
12.8 Valuation
...exist or according to a highest and best use that is not feasible. 8186 --------Notes:[8064] Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United States, 148 U.S. 312, 327 (1893); see also United States v. New River Collieries Co., 262 U.S. 341 (1923).[8065] United States v. Virginia Elec. & Power Co., 365......
-
12.8 Valuation
...exist or according to a highest and best use that is not feasible. 339 --------Notes:[227] Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United States, 148 U.S. 312, 327 (1893); see also United States v. New River Collieries Co., 262 U.S. 341 (1923).[228] United States v. Virginia Elec. & Power Co., 365 U.......
-
Resilience and Raisins: Partial Takings and Coastal Climate Change Adaptation
...292 U.S. 246, 255 (1934). 46. McCoy v. Union Elevated R.R. Co., 247 U.S. 354 (1918). 47. Monangahela Navigation Co. v. United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893). 48. 292 U.S. 246, 256 (1934). 49. Id. at 248. 50. Id. 51. Id. at 256-57. 52. Id. clusion. 53 In Bauman , the U.S. Congress began a proje......