Monroe v. Indiana Department of Transportation

Docket Number16-1959
Decision Date18 September 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
215 cases
  • Brown v. Dist. of Columbia
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • July 5, 2019
    ...773 F.3d 688, 702-03 (5th Cir. 2014) (motivating factor), with at least two circuits reserving the issue, see Monroe v. Ind. Dep’t of Transp. , 871 F.3d 495, 504 (7th Cir. 2017) ; Oehmke v. Medtronic, Inc. , 844 F.3d 748, 757 n.6 (8th Cir. 2016).After surveying the relevant cases and author......
  • Beverly v. Abbott Labs., 17 C 5590
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • July 10, 2019
    ...treatment of similarly situated employees, or pretextual reasons given for the adverse employment action. Monroe v. Ind. Dep't of Transp., 871 F.3d 495, 504 (7th Cir. 2017). 1. Termination With respect to Beverly's termination, the parties mainly focus the causation analysis on whether Abbo......
  • Richards v. Wilkie
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • September 27, 2020
    ...her job with or without reasonable accommodation;and (3) the adverse job action was caused by her disability. Monroe v. Ind. Dep't of Transp., 871 F.3d 495, 503 (7th Cir. 2017). To prevail on her retaliation claim, Plaintiff must show that (1) she engaged in protected activity; (2) she suff......
  • Duvall v. Heart of CarDon, LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Indiana
    • March 17, 2020
    ..."must construe all the facts and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party." Monroe v. Ind. Dep't of Transp. , 871 F.3d 495, 503 (7th Cir. 2017). All justifiable inferences to be drawn from the underlying facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT