Monroe v. United States
| Decision Date | 06 June 1966 |
| Docket Number | No. 22474.,22474. |
| Citation | 359 F.2d 380 |
| Parties | Henry MONROE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Henry Monroe, pro se.
John C. Ciolino, Asst. U. S. Atty., Louis C. LaCour, U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., for appellee.
Before BELL and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and FISHER, District Judge.
Certiorari Denied June 6, 1966. See 86 S.Ct. 1876.
Appellant asserts questions in a proceeding brought under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 which were assigned as error on the direct appeal of his case. Each was there decided adversely to him. Monroe v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 320 F.2d 277, cert. den., 375 U.S. 991, 84 S.Ct. 630, 11 L.Ed.2d 478. We are not convinced that the ruling then made was incorrect. The disposition of affirmance comes well within the teaching of Sanders v. United States, 1963, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Woodbury v. United States
-
Monroe v. United States
...contested the admission at trial of his testimony at the suppression hearing. The motion was denied, and we affirmed. Monroe v. United States, 5 Cir. 1966, 359 F.2d 380, cert. denied 384 U.S. 978, 86 S.Ct. 1876, 16 L.Ed.2d 689 Monroe's second pro se petition alleged the same defect, and was......
-
Monroe v. United States
...630, 11 L.Ed.2d 478. 3 No. 1178, Miscellaneous Docket. 4 Monroe v. United States, 320 F.2d 277, 279, 280 (CA 5-1963). 5 Monroe v. United States, 359 F.2d 380 (CA 5-1966). 6 No. 1251, Miscellaneous 7 Per Curiam Opinion, 389 F.2d 1005. 8 390 U.S. 377, 88 S.Ct. 967, 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968). 9 3......
-
Monroe v. United States
...Monroe v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 320 F.2d 277, certiorari denied 375 U.S. 991, 84 S.Ct. 630, 11 L.Ed.2d 478; Monroe v. United States, 5 Cir., 1966, 359 F.2d 380, certiorari denied 384 U.S. 978, 86 S.Ct. 1876, 16 L.Ed.2d 689. For the reasons which we stated in those cases, the judgment......