Montana Ass’n of Counties v. State

Docket NumberOP 17-0358
Decision Date01 November 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Thom v. Barnett
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • November 24, 2021
    ...because "[v]oters had no way to express their opinions" on each proposed constitutional amendment. Mont. Ass'n of Cntys. v. State, 404 P.3d 733, 747 (Mont. 2017). The Oregon Supreme Court similarly concluded that a failure to comply with the constitutional mandates for a constitutional amen......
  • League of Women Voters of Pa. v. Degraffenreid
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • December 21, 2021
    ...prevent the voters from expressing their opinions as to each proposed change separately."); Montana Association of Counties v. State by & through Fox, 389 Mont. 183, 404 P.3d 733, 742 (2017) ("[T]he proper inquiry is whether, if adopted, the proposal would make two or more changes to the Co......
  • State v. Spell
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • November 1, 2017
    ...389 Mont. 172404 P.3d 7252017 MT 266STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Appellee,v.Michael Keith SPELL, ... ...
  • Montanans Securing Reprod. Rts. v. Knudsen
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • March 18, 2024
    ...of the Montana Constitution, if it proposes an additional change to the Constitution, even if that effect is implicit. Mont. Ass’n of Counties v. State, 2017 MT 267, ¶ 28, 389 Mont. 183, 404 P.3d 733 ("MACo"). He argues that CI-14 implicitly changes Article II, Section 10, of the Montana Co......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Sb 127 - Criminal Procedure
    • United States
    • Georgia State University College of Law Georgia State Law Reviews No. 35-1, September 2018
    • Invalid date
    ...[https://perma. cc/33 YC-T8YB].73. Montana Ass'n of Ctys. v. Montana, 404 P.3d 733, 736 (Mont. 2017). 74. Id.75. Id.76. Jim Nelson, Marsy's Law. A Solution in Search of a Problem, INDEP. RECORD (Oct. 11, 2016), https://helenair.com/news/opinion/guest/marsy-s-law-a-solution-in-search-of-a-pr......