Montesano v. Liberty Warehouse Co.
Decision Date | 16 September 1938 |
Docket Number | No. 36.,36. |
Citation | 121 N.J.L. 124,1 A.2d 462 |
Parties | MONTESANO v. LIBERTY WAREHOUSE CO. et al. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
The maintenance by a newspaper of a branch office in a municipality other than that where the newspaper is printed and has its main publication, the branch office being for convenience in making local distribution of copies of the newspaper sent to it for that purpose, is not, under the facts of the case, a publishing in the first mentioned municipality within the meaning of sec. 33, para, (d) of the Uniform Warehouse Receipts Law, 4 c.s. p. 5777 at page 5782, R.s.1937, 57:1—36(d).
Appeal from Supreme Court.
Action by John Montesano against the Liberty Warehouse Company, and the Liberty Moving & Storage Company, jointly, severally and in the alternative. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
Louis Stein and Stein & Mandel, all of Union City, for appellants.
Lester J. Kramer, of Hoboken, for respondent.
The two defendants have such relations that they may be considered for the purpose of this decision as one.
The question is whether the Jersey Observer, a newspaper, was, within the meaning of sec. 33, para, (d) of the Uniform Warehouse Receipts Law, 4 C.S. p. 5777 at page 5782 (now to be found in the 1937 Rev. 57:l—36(d), published in the City of Union City, County of Hudson. The question arises upon the direction of verdict granted by the trial court against the defendants, leaving to the jury only the question of the amount of damages.
Plaintiff stored with the defendant, a warehouse company, certain goods and chattels. Upon default arising in the payment of the storage charges, defendant sold the goods. The statutory provision follows:
An advertisement was inserted in the Jersey Observer and was concededly a compliance with the statute if that paper was published in the City of Union City where the sale was held; otherwise the advertisement did not conform to the statute and the directed verdict was properly granted. Admittedly there was a newspaper, the Hudson Dispatch,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hunterdon County Democrat, Inc. v. Recorder Pub. Co. of Bernardsville
... ... In this State the term 'place of publication' was considered in Montesano v. Liberty Warehouse Co., 121 N.J.L. 124, 1 A.2d 462 (E. & A.1938), the question being whether the ... ...
-
City of Plainfield v. Courier-News
... ... Review continued to be published at Whitehouse Station, relying on the formulation of Montesano v. Liberty Warehouse Co., 121 N.J.L. 124, 125, 1 A.2d 462, 463 (E. & A. 1938) that 'the place of ... ...
-
Hughes v. Accredited Movers, Inc.
... ... In Montesano v. Liberty Warehouse Co., 121 N.J.L. 124, 128, 1 A.2d 462 (E. & A.1938), the court invalidated a ... ...
-
Express Pub., Inc. v. City of Ketchum, E-D
... ... [114 Idaho 117] commented upon in Montesano v. Liberty Warehouse County, 121 N.J. 124, 1 A.2d 462 (1938). There the Court stated: ... ...