Montgomery v. Demarco, 2017–03499

Decision Date31 October 2018
Docket Number2017–03499,Index No. 121/15
Citation84 N.Y.S.3d 798 (Mem),165 A.D.3d 1262
Parties In the Matter of Donald MONTGOMERY, Respondent, v. Vincent F. DEMARCO, etc., Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Dennis M. Brown, County Attorney, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Marlene L. Budd of counsel), for appellant.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., RUTH C. BALKIN, ROBERT J. MILLER, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review determinations of the Suffolk County Sheriff, which suspended and then cancelled the petitioner's pistol license, the Suffolk County Sheriff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Daniel Martin, J.), dated June 8, 2016. The judgment granted the petition to the extent of directing the Suffolk County Sheriff to provide the petitioner with written notice of the charges against him and to hold a hearing on the matter or otherwise permit the petitioner to submit evidence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner is a former Suffolk County police officer. Upon his retirement in 2005, he obtained a pistol license (see generally Penal Law § 400.00 ), and he renewed that license in 2010. In May 2014, the petitioner sought treatment at Eastern Long Island Hospital (hereinafter the hospital) for insomnia. He was admitted to the hospital and remained there for two days. Several days after leaving the hospital, the petitioner was notified by letter from the Pistol License Section of the Suffolk County Sheriff (hereinafter the Sheriff) that his license was suspended. The Sheriff stated in the letter: "The Division of State Police has notified our office that you have been adjudicated as mental defective or have been involuntarily committed to a mental institution. Under federal law, you are prohibited from possessing a firearm, rifle, or shotgun." Allegedly, unbeknownst to the petitioner, the hospital had categorized his admission as "involuntary."

The petitioner sought an opportunity to contest the alleged adjudication, but the Sheriff declined to hold a hearing on the ground that the petitioner was not eligible to possess a firearm and the Sheriff had "no authority to change that." On the same day the Sheriff declined to hold a hearing, he notified the petitioner that his pistol license was "cancelled" based on his alleged violation of the requirement that he notify the Sheriff within 10 days of any change in his address. The...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT