Montgomery v. NC Dept. of Motor Vehicles
Decision Date | 04 August 1978 |
Docket Number | No. C-C-77-122.,C-C-77-122. |
Citation | 455 F. Supp. 338 |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of North Carolina |
Parties | Donald H. MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES and Commissioner Edward Powell, Defendants. |
Jean A. Benoy, Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, N. C., for defendants.
On May 6, 1977, the plaintiff filed this action claiming that the procedures adopted by N.C.G.S. § 20-16.2(a) and the procedures which led to the revocation of his driving privileges for six months are an unconstitutional deprivation of a property right without due process of law and a denial of equal protection of the laws. He sought a preliminary and permanent injunction against the enforcement of the judgment revoking his license and a declaratory judgment that the statute on its face and as applied in his case is unconstitutional. On June 14, 1977, an order was filed denying the motion for a preliminary injunction. By this judgment the plaintiff is denied all relief sought.
N.C.G.S. § 20-16.2 provides:
By a stipulation filed August 24, 1977, the parties have agreed that the following facts are true:
On September 13, 1975, the plaintiff was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol in Union County, North Carolina. After being advised of his rights and the results of a refusal as required by N.C.G.S. § 20-16.2(a), the plaintiff was requested to submit to a breathalyzer examination. The plaintiff refused. On November 10, 1975, the North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles issued a notice that the plaintiff's driver's license was revoked for six months beginning November 20, 1975. The plaintiff within three days of receipt of the notice requested a hearing in writing. Under subsection (d) of § 20-16.2, this request automatically stayed the revocation. The revocation was sustained by a hearing officer of the North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles. On December 5, 1975, the plaintiff filed a petition for stay of the revocation and for hearing de novo in Mecklenburg County Superior Court to determine whether his license was properly revoked. On December 9, 1975, an order of the Superior Court stayed enforcement of the license revocation notice and set the case for de novo hearing. That hearing was conducted on January 26, 1976. The trial judge, pursuant to a judgment filed January 29, 1976, found among other things that the arresting officer had reasonable grounds to arrest the plaintiff for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and he affirmed the revocation. The plaintiff sought review of the decision by the North Carolina Court of Appeals and the North Carolina Supreme Court. On December 15, 1976,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brooks v. United States
...F.Supp. 184 (E.D.Pa. 1974), aff'd, 515 F.2d 507 (3d Cir. 1975); to submit to a breathalyzer examination, Montgomery v. N.C. Dept of Motor Vehicles, 455 F.Supp. 338 (W.D.N.C. 1978), aff'd, 599 F.2d 1048 (4th Cir. 1979), or a dental examination, United States v. Holland, 378 F.Supp. 144 (E.D.......
-
Samuel v. Hogan
...individual has not availed themselves of the process); Snider Int'l Corp., 739 F.3d at 149-50; see also Montgomery v. N.C. Dep't. of Motor Vehicles, 455 F. Supp. 338, 341 (W.D.N.C. 1978) (holding that due process was not violated when the state would provide a hearing only at the request of......
- Sabree v. United Broth. of Carpenters and Joiners Local No. 33
-
Leverson v. Conway
...follow that the right to drive is fundamental in the constitutional sense." Id. at 858; accord Montgomery v. North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles, 455 F.Supp. 338, 342 (W.D.N.C.1978) (revocation of driver's license for refusal to submit to chemical tests does not deprive licensee of ......