Montgomery v. State Election Bd.
| Decision Date | 28 October 1910 |
| Docket Number | Case Number: 2052 |
| Citation | Montgomery v. State Election Bd., 27 Okla. 324, 111 P. 447, 1910 OK 301 (Okla. 1910) |
| Parties | MONTGOMERY v. STATE ELECTION BOARD et al. |
| Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
¶0 COURTS--Supreme Court--Original Jurisdiction--Writs of Certiorari. An action was originally instituted in this court by M., a qualified elector and taxpayer in the county of O., and also a member of the county election board of said county, for a writ of certiorari to issue to the State Election Board, and also the county election board of said county, directing said State Election Board to certify to this court a record of all proceedings had with reference to the resignation of P. as a member thereof and the appointment of M. in his stead, and that the pretended appointment of M. be set aside and held for naught; and further that a writ to the county election board of O. county be issued directing said board to certify to this court a record of all proceedings had by S. as a member thereof since September 8, 1910, and that all proceedings had by them be set aside, vacated and held for naught. Held, that this court has not original jurisdiction of such action.
Original Application for Writ of Certiorari.
Application by Hunter Montgomery for a writ of certiorari to the state election board and the county election board of Okfuskee county. Writ quashed, and proceeding dismissed.
Burford & Burford, for plaintiff.
Charles West, Attorney General, and Charles L. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, for defendants.--Citing Homesteaders v. McCombs, 24 Okla. 204.
¶1 On October 10, 1910, the plaintiff, as a qualified, elector, property owner and taxpayer in the county of Okfuskee, of this state, and also as a member of the county election board of said county, filed a petition in this court asking for a writ of certiorari to issue to the state election board and the county election board of Okfuskee county directing said state election board to certify to this court a record of all proceedings had with reference to the resignation of J. B. Patterson as a member thereof, and the appointment of H. H. Mosier in his stead, and that the pretended appointment of said Mosier be set aside and held for naught, and that a further writ to the county election board of Okfuskee county be issued directing said board to certify to this court all the proceedings had by A. V. Skelton, a member of said county election board, and the said H. H. Mosier acting as a member thereof, on or since September 8, 1910, and that all the proceedings had by them be set aside, vacated and held for naught. A writ was issued requiring said state election board to so certify a record of its proceedings or to show cause why it should not be so certified. Said board, having made due return to such writ through the Attorney General, has challenged the jurisdiction of this court in this proceeding.
¶2 The case at bar seems to be concluded by that of Homesteaders v. McCombs, Ins. Com'r, 24 Okla. 201, 103 P. 691, wherein it was said:
¶3 On page 209 of 24 Okla. page 694 of 103 Pac., it is further said:
¶4 Section 4, art. 3, of the Constitution of this state provides:
"The Legislature shall enact laws creating an election board (not more than a majority of whose members shall be selected from...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Dunham v. Ardery
...65 P. 749; Bd. Com'rs v. State ex rel. Cobb, 31 Okla. 196, 120 P. 913; Norris v. Cross, 25 Okla. 287, 105 P. 1000; Montgomery v. State Elec. Bd., 27 Okla. 324, 111 P. 447; McKee v. Adair Elec. Bd., 36 Okla. 258, 128 P. 294; Roberts et al. v. Marshall et al., 33 Okla. 716, 127 P. 703. In the......
-
State v. Ross
...S.) 1000, 20 A. & E. Ann. Cas. 181; State ex rel. West v. Cobb, 24 Okla. 662, 104 P. 361, 24 L.R.A. (N. S.) 639; Montgomery v. State Election Board, 27 Okla. 324, 111 P. 447; Smith v. Hall, 28 Okla. 435, 114 P. 608; State ex rel. Freeling v. McCullough, 67 Okla. 8, 168 P. 413. In the Homest......
-
Haddock v. Johnson
...test." ¶5 This same construction of this section of the Constitution was reaffirmed by this court in the case of Montgomery v. State Election Board, 27 Okla. 324, 111 P. 447. If the commissions and boards referred to in section 2, article 7, are such boards and commissions as may be vested ......
-
Claiborne Co. v. Joint Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 7
...Benedictine Fathers of Sacred Heart Mission, 45 Okla. 358, 145 P. 494; Parmenter v. Ray, 58 Okla. 27, 158 P. 1183; Montgomery v. State Election Board, 27 Okla. 324, 111 P. 147; Homesteaders v. McCombs, Ins. Com., 24 Okla. 201, 103 P. 691; Palmer v. Harris, 23 Okla. 500, 101 P. 852; Baker v.......