Montgomery v. United States
| Decision Date | 13 April 1896 |
| Docket Number | No. 186,186 |
| Citation | 40 L.Ed. 1020,16 S.Ct. 797,162 U.S. 410 |
| Parties | MONTGOMERY v. UNITED STATES |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Creed F. Bates, for plaintiff in error.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Whitney, for the United States.
Thomas M. Montgomery, the plaintiff in error, was indicted in the circuit court of the United States for the Eastern district of Tennessee for the crime of embezzling and stealing on March 8 and 9, 1890, certain letters containing money in United States currency, which had come into his possession as a railway postal clerk or route agent on the railway mail route between Chattanooga, Tenn., and Bristol, Tenn. The defendant was tried, convicted, and sentenced to be confined at hard labor for the term of two years in the penitentiary at Columbus, Ohio.
At the trial it appeared that the letters taken had been mailed for the purpose of detecting the defendant; in other words, were 'decoy' lotters; and thereupon the defendant asked the court to instruct the jury that, as the letters taken were mailed for the purpose of entrapping defendant into the commission of a crime, there could be no conviction of the defendant for the taking of said letters.
The refusal of the court to so charge is the subject of the first assignment of error.
To disposes of this assignment it is sufficient to cite the case of Goode v. U. S., 159 U. S. 663, 16 Sup. Ct. 136, where it was held that, in an indictment against a letter carrier charged with secreting, embezzling, or destroying a letter containing postage stamps, the fact that the letter was a decoy is no defense.
Error was likewise assigned to the refusal of the court to charge that there was a fatal variance between the indictment and proof in respect to the description of the letters, for the stealing or embezzling of which the defendant was indicted.
In the indictment it was averred that the letters in question had come into the defendant's possession as a railway postal clerk, to be conveyed by mail, and to be delivered to the persons addressed. It was disclosed by the evidence that the letters and money thus mailed belonged to the inspectors who mailed them, and were to be intercepted and withdrawn from the mails by them before they reached the persons to whom they were addressed.
There is no merit in this assignment. The letters put in evidence corresponded, in address and contents, to the letters described in the indictment, and it made no difference, with respect to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
O'BRIEN v. United States
...161 U. S. 29, 16 S. Ct. 434, 480, 40 L. Ed. 606; Grimm v. U. S., 156 U. S. 604, 15 S. Ct. 470, 39 L. Ed. 550; Montgomery v. U. S., 162 U. S. 410, 16 S. Ct. 797, 40 L. Ed. 1020; Scott v. U. S., 172 U. S. 343, 19 S. Ct. 209, 43 L. Ed. 471; U. S. v. Smith, 43 F.(2d) 173 (D. C. Tex.); Patton v.......
-
Roth v. United States
... ... reasonable ground to believe that mail matter was being ... stolen by a post office employe, the use of a decoy letter to ... identify the culprit was proper. Grimm v. United ... States, 156 U.S. 604, 609, 610, 15 Sup.Ct. 470, 39 L.Ed ... 550; Montgomery v. United States, 162 U.S. 410, 16 ... Sup.Ct. 797, 40 L.Ed. 1020; Goldman v. United States ... (C.C.A. 6) 220 F. 57, 62, 135 C.C.A. 625. However, ... section 195 of the Penal Code (Comp. St. Sec. 10365), which ... was in the mind of the one drafting the indictment, provides ... ...
-
U.S. v. Hergenrader, 75--1642
...States Supreme Court. See Scott v. United States, supra, 172 U.S. 343, 19 S.Ct. 209, 43 L.Ed. 471 (1899); Montgomery v. United States, 162 U.S. 410, 16 S.Ct. 797, 40 L.Ed. 1020 (1895). In applying the objective standard, the court does not look to the intent of the person who prepared the l......
-
State v. Smith
... ... defendant if he should commit the crime." ... "So, ... in Goode v. United States, 159 U.S. 663, 16 S.Ct. 136, 40 ... L.Ed. 297, the court said: 'That the fact that the ... authorities to be now open to contention.' And in ... Montgomery v. United States, 162 U.S. 410, 16 ... S.Ct. 797, 40 L.Ed. 1020, on the authority of Goode v ... ...