Moody v. Nelson

Decision Date30 September 1871
Citation1871 WL 8121,60 Ill. 229
PartiesJOSEPH MOODYv.HENRY NELSON et al.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

WRIT OF ERROR to the Circuit Court of Kane county; the Hon. SILVANUS WILCOX, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. COLEMAN, MADDEN & BYFORD, for the plaintiff in error.

Messrs. BOTSFORD, BARRY & HEALY, for the defendants in error.

Per CURIAM:

This is a writ of error to the Kane county circuit court, to bring up for review a judgment entered in that court upon the award of arbitrators.

The 1st section of the statute, under which this proceeding was had, is as follows: “All persons having the requisite legal capacity may, by an instrument in writing, to be signed and sealed by them, and attested by at least one witness, submit to one or more arbitrators any controversy existing between them, not in suit; and may, in such submission, agree that a judgment of any court of record, competent to have jurisdiction of the subject matter, to be named in such instrument, shall be rendered upon the award made pursuant to such submission.”Gross' Stat. 51.

The submission under which the award was made, is not in conformity with the statute.It was not attested by any witness, nor does it contain any agreement that a judgment shall be rendered upon the award made pursuant to such submission.All that it...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Burkland v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • March 3, 1897
    ...existing between them to arbitration by an instrument in writing, signed by them and attested by at least one witness. In Moody v. Nelson, 60 Ill. 229, the parties their differences to arbitration by an instrument in writing, but it was not witnessed, and the supreme court held that the cir......
  • Gessner v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • July 30, 1906
    ...v. Johnson (Neb.) 70 N. W. 388. See, also, Darling v. Darling, 16 Wis. 644;Steel v. Steel, 1 Nev. 27;Low v. Nolte, 15 Ill. 368;Moody v. Nelson, 60 Ill. 229;Holdridge v. Stowell (Minn.) 40 N. W. 259. The judgment in this case is based wholly upon the alleged award. The plaintiff challenged i......
  • Burkland v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • March 3, 1897
    ...existing between them to arbitration by an instrument in writing, signed by them, and attested by at least one witness. In Moody v. Nelson, 60 Ill. 229, the parties submitted their differences to arbitration by an instrument in writing, but it was not witnessed, and the supreme court held t......
  • Gessner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • June 23, 1906
    ...is fatal, and deprives the court of jurisdiction to affirm the award. Berkland v. Johnson, 70 N.W. 388; Fink v. Fink, 8 Iowa 313; Moody v. Nelson, 60 Ill. 229; Abbott v. 6 Cushing, 108; Barney v. Flower, 7 N.W. 823; Gibson v. Burrows, 3 N.W. 200; Holdridge v. Stowell, 40 N.W. 259; Heath v. ......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT