Moody v. Thomas
Decision Date | 20 February 2015 |
Docket Number | No. 2:12–cv–4139–LSC.,2:12–cv–4139–LSC. |
Parties | Walter Leroy MOODY, Petitioner, v. Kim T. THOMAS, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, Respondent. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama |
Anne E. Borelli, William M. Ermine, Federal Defenders, Montgomery, AL, for Petitioner.
Henry Mitchell Johnson, James R. Houts, Office of the Attorney General, Montgomery, AL, for Respondent.
This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by Petitioner Walter Leroy Moody (“Moody”), now incarcerated at Holman Prison in Atmore, Alabama. Moody challenges the validity of his 1996 convictions for capital murder and first degree assault and sentences of death and life without parole in connection with the December 1989 pipe-bomb murder of Judge Robert S. Vance of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.1 Upon thorough consideration of the entire record and the briefs submitted by the parties, the Court finds that Moody's petition for habeas relief is due to be denied.
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals (hereinafter, the “ACCA”), in its opinion on direct appeal from Moody's conviction, set out the background facts of this case, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Whatley v. Dunn
... ... [T]he deference due is heavy ... and purposely presents a daunting hurdle for a habeas ... petitioner to clear.” Loggins v. Thomas , 654 ... F.3d 1204, 1220 (11th Cir. 2011); see also Greene v ... Fisher , 565 U.S. 34, 132 S.Ct. 38, 181 L.Ed.2d 336 ... (2011) ... see id. at 1004-06. So counsel had no basis to ... object to these aspects of the jury charge.”); ... Moody v. Thomas , 89 F.Supp.3d 1167, 1238 (N.D. Ala ... 2015), aff'd sub nom. Moody v. Comm'r, Alabama ... Dep't of Corr. , 682 Fed.Appx. 802 ... ...
-
Roseberry v. Ryan
...The claims are denied as vagueand conclusory. See Greenway, 653 F.3d at 804; James, 24 F.3d at 26; see also Moody v. Thomas, 89 F. Supp. 3d 1167, 1263 (N.D. Ala. 2015) (rejecting appellate ineffective assistance claim where petitioner "failed to plead sufficient facts to indicate that his a......
-
Hoover v. Clarke
...of the accused.'1''' Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 482 (1981) (citation omitted) (emphasis added); see also Moody v. Thomas, 89 F.Supp.3d 1167, 1217 (N.D. Ala. 2015) ("[T]he Sixth Amendment right to counsel '"is a shield' and 'should not be used as a sword with the purpose of obstructin......
-
Tillman v. Edwards
...court's application of the Strickland standard was unreasonable, not whether defense counsel's performance fell below the Strickland standard. Id. This “[d]ouble deference is difficult for a petitioner to overcome, and it will be a rare case in which an ineffective assistance of counsel cla......