Moonlit Waters Apartments, Inc. v. Cauley
Decision Date | 25 January 1996 |
Docket Number | No. 85489,85489 |
Citation | 666 So.2d 898 |
Parties | 21 Fla. L. Weekly S41 MOONLIT WATERS APARTMENTS, INC., Petitioner, v. Joseph J. CAULEY, Respondent. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Harvey K. Mattel, Fort Lauderdale, for Petitioner.
Michael T. Burke and Christine M. Duignan of Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke & George, Fort Lauderdale, for Respondent.
We have for review Moonlit Waters Apartments, Inc. v. Cauley, 651 So.2d 1269 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), wherein the district court of appeal certified the following question to be of great public importance:
WHETHER SECTION 719.401(1)(f)1 APPLIES TO AN EXISTING LONG TERM GROUND LEASE ENTERED INTO AT ARM'S LENGTH UPON WHICH ALL IMPROVEMENTS OF A COOPERATIVE APARTMENT COMPLEX HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED.
We have jurisdiction. Art. V, Sec. 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
Moonlit Waters Apartments, Inc. (Moonlit Waters) is the governing association of a twenty-unit cooperative apartment building with a pool, a dock, and parking areas, all on three subdivision lots on the east side of the intracoastal waterway in Broward County. Moonlit Waters has a 99-year ground lease, which commenced in 1965, providing for annual rental payments adjusted at ten-year intervals based upon changes in the consumer price index. Joseph J. Cauley is lessor of the property, as trustee for the owner. In 1991, Moonlit Waters informed Cauley that it wished to purchase the entire property, pursuant to section 719.401(1)(f)1, Florida Statutes (1991), which requires a lease of recreational or other commonly used facilities, entered into before the unit owners receive control of the association, to include an option to purchase. Cauley refused to enter into negotiations with Moonlit Waters to sell the property.
Moonlit Waters filed a motion to appoint an arbitrator to decide upon a sales price for the property, pursuant to section 719.401(1)(f)1. The circuit court denied the motion, finding that the statute violated the United States and Florida constitutions. The court reasoned that appointing an arbitrator would violate Cauley's due process rights by denying him the opportunity to retain property in which he has a vested right. The Fourth District Court of Appeal declined to reach the constitutional issue, finding that the statute applies only to a lease of recreational or other commonly used facilities, and does not apply to an all-encompassing underlying land lease. Moonlit Waters Apartments, Inc., 651 So.2d at 1270.
Section 719.401(1)(f)1 provides in pertinent part: "A lease of recreational or other commonly used facilities entered into by the [cooperative] association or unit owners prior to the time the control of the association is turned over to unit owners other than the developer shall grant to the lessee an option to purchase the leased property...."
In construing a statute, we look first to the statute's plain meaning. Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla.1992). Section 719.401(1)(f)1 applies to leases "of" recreational or other commonly used facilities, not to land leases "including" recreational or...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
LAWNWOOD Med. Ctr. INC. v. SADOW
...Co. v. Hamm, 414 So.2d 1071, 1073 (Fla.1982). 14. Golf Channel v. Jenkins, 752 So.2d 561, 564 (Fla.2000); Moonlit Waters Apts., Inc. v. Cauley, 666 So.2d 898, 900 (Fla. 1996). 15. Forsythe v. Longboat Key Beach Erosion Control Dist., 604 So.2d 452, 455 (Fla. 1992). 16. State v. Goode, 830 S......
-
Closet Maid v. Sykes, 1D98-660.
...a statute, the court must look first to the plain meaning of the terms used in the statute itself. See Moonlit Waters Apartments, Inc. v. Cauley, 666 So.2d 898 (Fla.1996); Acosta v. Richter, 671 So.2d 149 (1996). If the language and meaning are clear, the court must interpret the statute ac......
-
Gretna Racing, LLC v. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Regulation
...II. B. particularly persuasive. "In construing a statute, we look first to the statute's plain meaning." Moonlit Waters Apts., Inc. v. Cauley, 666 So.2d 898, 900 (Fla.1996). "[R]elative and qualifying words, phrases and clauses are to be applied to the words or phrase immediately preceding,......
-
Knowles v. Beverly Enterprises-Florida
...In determining that intent, we have explained that "we look first to the statute's plain meaning." Moonlit Waters Apartments, Inc. v. Cauley, 666 So.2d 898, 900 (Fla.1996). Normally, "[w]hen the language of the statute is clear and unambiguous and conveys a clear and definite meaning, there......
-
Legal developments impacting repeat battery offenders: Warren and the 2001 amendment to felony battery.
...unius est exclusio alterius, the mention of one thing implies the exclusion of another." Moonlit Waters Apartments, Inc. v. Cauley, 666 So. 2d 898, 900 (Fla. 1996) (citation (31) Warren, 796 So. 2d at 491. (32) See, e.g., Grimes v. State, 724 So.2d 614 (Fla. 5th D.C.A. 1998) (robbery can be......