Moore v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

Decision Date20 December 1960
Docket NumberGen. No. 47989
Citation28 Ill.App.2d 340,97 A.L.R.2d 511,171 N.E.2d 393
Parties, 97 A.L.R.2d 511 Joe MOORE, Administrator of the Estate of Vernon F. Adair, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

William H. DeParcq, Robert J. Martineau, Chicago, Charles Alan Wright, Austin, Tex., of counsel, for appellant.

Floyd Stuppi, William J. O'Brien, Jr., John J. Schmidt, Chicago, C. George Niebank, Jr., Chicago, of counsel, for appellee.

BURKE, Presiding Justice.

The administrator of the estate of Vernon F. Adair, deceased, sued on behalf of the widow and seven dependent children under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., to recover damages for his death caused by the alleged negligence of defendant in a collision of two of its trains. Following a verdict and judgment for the defendant, and the denial of motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

At 12:36 A.M. on July 5, 1955, two trains of the defendant came together in a head-on collision on a single track main line near Cardenas, New Mexico. Adair, the head brakeman on one of the trains, was killed. He was head brakeman on a train designated as '241 West.' The other members of the crew were J. C. Cenipe, the engineer, I. W. Bell, the fireman, C. C. McDaniel, the conductor, and D. Moreland, the rear brakeman. Cenipe and Bell were also killed in the collision. Cenipe had been an engineer for about 32 years and knew how to check out a train. He arose at 9:30 that morning and spent most of the day at home. He was in good health. He had a plate in his head from a previous accident but it was not known to cause him any trouble. Bell had 14 years railroading experience and had been promoted to engineer. He arose that morning about 6 o'clock and spent the day at the site of the house he was building. He appeared to be in good health that day. The engineer and fireman were good, competent employees.

Adair appeared to be in good physical condition when he appeared for work the night of the occurrence. He had passed the examination for and had been promoted to conductor. He was conversant with defendant's rules which, among other things, placed responsibility on him for communicating to members of the engine crew the indication of each signal affecting movement of the train. In case of emergency he was required to call it to the attention of the other employees and do what he could to meet it safely, including stopping the train. As head brakeman Adair was in the cab of extra '241 West' along with the engineer and the fireman. The engineer and fireman were primarily responsible for keeping a lookout ahead. Under the company rules if the engineer failed to observe signals or became incapacitated the fireman was required to stop the train. The rules provided that the engineer must require the brakeman to look back over the train frequently to detect any defect in the train and for signals. The engineer must not permit even the fireman to operate the engine except when he has been qualified by a certain amount of experience. There is no evidence that on that night Adair had either the occasion or the authority to touch the controls of the locomotive.

The westbound train, '241 West,' consisted of 3 diesel-electric units, 132 freight cars and a caboose. It was a mile and a quarter long. In the cab of the diesel from which the train was operated, the engineer's seat was on the right side, the fireman's on the left and the brakeman's in the middle. The train with which '241 West' collided was designated as 'Extra 205 East.' It was made up of 4 diesel-electric units, 84 cars and a caboose. The crew of that train consisted of E. G. Abernathy, the engineer, W. B. Hester, the fireman, C. H. Peterson, the conductor, J. W. Fryer, the head brakeman, and E. W. Hailey, the rear brakeman. Abernathy and Fryer were killed in the collision. The diesel units on '241 West' were given the yearly, monthly and daily electrical and mechanical tests and inspections required by the Interstate Commerce Commission, and were found to be in perfect running order. The only defect noted in this equipment by the last engineer who operated it was a leak in the radiator of one unit, which was held at Clovis, New Mexico, for repairs and was not a part of the train at the time of the collision. This train departed from Clovis, New Mexico, at approximately 8:05 P.M. on July 4, 1955, heading west to Vaughan, New Nexico, 130.8 miles away.

The eastbound train, 'Extra 205 East,' left Vaughan headed east to Clovis at approximately 12:05 A.M. on July 5, 1955. Its headlight was in proper working order and was on up to the time of the collision. Both '241 West' and 'Extra 205 East' were equipped with a safety pedal located immediately in front of and below the engineer's seat. It requires about 3 1/2 or 4 pounds of pressure from the engineer's foot to depress this pedal to the floor. If for any reason the engineer's foot is released from the safety pedal the train's brakes are automatically applied. When '241 West' departed from Clovis the gauge in the caboose which reflects the air pressure in the train's braking system showed 70-75 pounds of pressure, within the allowable minimum of 80 pounds. The brakes on '241 West' worked properly when used that night at Tolar, New Mexico, at 9:36 P.M., about 50 miles east of Cardenas. The brakes on 'Extra 205 East' tested normally before it departed from Vaughan.

At the point of the occurrence, Cardenas, New Mexico, defendant operates a singletrack main line along which are numerous sidings to permit trains to pass one another. The movement of trains in this area is governed by signals and switches controlled by a dispatcher located at Clovis, under a system referred to as 'Centralized Traffic Control' or simply 'C.T.C.' The track and roadbed in this area are inspected regularly and were inspected the day before the collision and found to be in good condition. On the C.T.C. machine at Clovis there is a track diagram and a series of lights and levers showing the status of signals and switches in the territory covered. A graphic record of the operation of signals and switches is maintained by the machine. The dispatcher in charge of the C.T.C. machine governs the movements of trains in the C.T.C. territory covered by the particular machine. He can determine from the machine approximately where trains will meet, and when two trains are approaching one another he switches one into a siding in order that the other train may pass. While the dispatcher cannot at all times determine the exact location of all the trains in the territory, he can tell whether a train is on a 'O.S. Circuit' (a 500-foot stretch of track extending from either side of the switch) between 'O.S. Circuits' or that it is in a siding, and can thereby follow its progress as it moves through these points.

If a switch operated by the dispatcher fails to lock properly the C.T.C. machine automatically puts the signals at that point in a red condition. All switches are equiped with a time control safety device which requires the lapse of approximately 5 minutes before a switch can be reversed, once signals have been cleared for an opposing movement. If the dispatcher directed a westbound train into a siding in order to let an eastbound train pass and gave the eastbound train a green board (signal), he could not, in the face of that green light, reverse the switch and let the westbound train out of the siding. If the westbound train in the siding disregarded the red signal against it and went out past the switch onto the main line the green signal for the eastbound train would automatically go red. The system is designed so that it is not possible to clear opposing signals in the same area at the same time, and actual tests confirmed this. Regular inspections prior to the collision failed to disclose any defects in the signal mechanisms in the area.

Train '241 West' first came into the C.T.C. territory from the east headed west at 8:50 P.M. It did not stay on the main line all the time as it proceeded westbound. It was directed into sidings to permit trains to pass at Cantara (9:00 P.M.), Krider, Tolar (9:36 P.M.), Ricardo (10:17 P.M.), Evanola (11:02 P.M.), and Yeso (11:42 P.M.). 'Extra 205 East' came into the C.T.C. territory headed east from the west at 12:18 A.M. on July 5, 1955. After '241 West' and Extra 205 East' were both in the C.T.C. territory the dispatcher ascertained that they would meet at Cardenas. Because '205 East' carried perishable commodities, while '241 West' carried mostly empties, the dispatcher determined that 'Extra 205 East' should be the 'superior' train, given the right of way, and '241 West' directed into a siding at Cardenas to permit it to pass. The siding at Cardenas into which the dispatcher determined to direct '241 West' is 2.28 miles long. At each end of it there are signals and switches to govern ingress and egress to and from the main line. There was an 'intermediate' signal along this siding to govern the movement and speed of trains operating on it. These switches and signals were regularly inspected. The switch at the west end of the Cardenas siding had been inspected and found to be operating properly only 9 hours before the collision. The dispatcher set the signal at the east end of the Cardenas siding so that '241 West' would be directed into the siding. It was his intention to put '241 'West' on the siding to permit 'Extra 205 East' to proceed without delay along the main line. Until '241 West' was in the siding, the signal at the east end would show red to an eastbound train. However, as soon as '241 West' was off the main line and on the siding, the dispatcher would line the main line signals and switch to show green,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Del Raso v. Elgin, J. & E. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 16 Junio 1967
    ...knowing that they were being made ill by the paint removal, persisted in remaining on the job. In Moore v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co., 28 Ill.App.2d 340, 171 N.E.2d 393, 97 A.L.R.2d 511, the court held that the burden of proof of contributory negligence in F.E.L.A. cases is on the defendan......
  • Quinby v. Plumsteadville Family Practice
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 18 Octubre 2006
    ...while she was sitting at her desk, plaintiff was entitled to a directed verdict based on res ipsa loquitur); Moore v. Atchison, 28 Ill.App.2d 340, 171 N.E.2d 393 (1960) (finding that directed verdict for the plaintiff was proper where there was no direct evidence as to why two trains collid......
  • Liepelt v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 5 Julio 1978
    ...the performance of his duty and exercised due care for his own safety at the time of his death." Moore v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. (1960), 28 Ill. App.2d 340, 355, 171 N.E.2d 393. The evidence relied on by the defendant to show contributory negligence consists of the results obta......
  • Imig v. Beck
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 19 Diciembre 1986
    ...910, 284 N.E.2d 406; Erckman v. Northern Illinois Gas Co. (1965), 61 Ill.App.2d 137, 210 N.E.2d 42; Moore v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. (1961), 28 Ill.App.2d 340, 171 N.E.2d 393; see generally McCormick, Evidence sec. 342, at 805 n. 38 (2d ed. 1972); Annot., 97 A.L.R.2d 522 (1964);......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT