Moore v. Kraft

CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
CitationMoore v. Kraft, 179 F. 685 (7th Cir. 1910)
Decision Date19 April 1910
Docket Number1,620.
PartiesMOORE v. KRAFT.

In April, 1909, plaintiff in error filed his declaration in debt against defendant in error upon a judgment rendered in a state court of Arkansas. From the record of that judgment it appears that in December, 1898, plaintiff in error was appointed by a probate court of Arkansas administrator of the estate of Sallie B. Kraft, who died intestate leaving real and personal property and also creditors in Arkansas; that as such administrator he brought an action in an Arkansas court to recover a debt which had been incurred by defendant in error to said Sallie B. Kraft; that defendant in error appeared and defended the action; and that the judgment now in suit resulted.

To the present declaration defendant in error pleaded 'that Sallie B. Kraft in her lifetime was a citizen and resident of the state of Illinois, and had her domicile in the county of St. Clair in the said state of Illinois at the time of her decease and for a long time previous thereto, and that she was at the time of her decease the wife of the said defendant; that upon the decease of the said Sallie B. Kraft the said defendant, F. W. Kraft, was by the probate court of St. Clair county, Illinois, duly appointed the administrator of the estate of the said Sallie B. Kraft, and that she died intestate; that upon the decease of the said Sallie B. Kraft and the appointment of defendant as administrator of her estate, he took upon himself the administration of the assets of the said Sallie B. Kraft; and that he has been since the time of his appointment until the present time and still is administrator of the estate of the said Sallie B. Kraft. And defendant further avers that the said John P. Moore, if in fact he was ever appointed administrator of the estate of Sallie B. Kraft, deceased, was appointed as an ancillary administrator in the county of Phillips in the state of Arkansas, and that whatever assets belong to the estate of Sallie B. Kraft, deceased, are subject to administration and distribution in the state of Illinois, the place of her domicile at the time of her decease, and that the said John P. Moore as administrator of the estate of Sallie B. Kraft deceased, has no right, power, or authority to maintain an action in the state of Illinois for the recovery of any of the assets of the said Sallie B. Kraft, deceased; and this the said defendant is ready to verify.'

Plaintiff in error demurred to this plea on the grounds: (1) That it alleged matters 'which could not be set up after judgment to avoid its effect in the state from which the record came'; (2) that 'all such matters should have been set up in the original action and are now res adjudicata'; and (3) that 'after judgment the debt became personal to the plaintiff, the style of administrator being merely descriptive and not essential to a recovery.'

The demurrer was overruled, plaintiff in error elected to stand by his demurrer, and the court adjudged that 'Moore administrator of the estate of Sallie B. Kraft, deceased, in the state of Arkansas, be and he is barred of his action upon the judgment in said declaration described, without prejudice to the right of action on said judgment by a domestic administrator, or administrator appointed by the proper court in Illinois of the estate of said Sallie B. Kraft, where the said Sallie B....

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Cramer v. Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn., 10786-10789.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 6 July 1937
    ...not apply to a cause of action involving a right which did not belong to the deceased. Moore v. Petty (C.C.A. 8) 135 F. 668; Moore v. Kraft (C.C.A. 7) 179 F. 685; Greasons v. Davis, 9 Iowa, 219; Chamberlain v. Wilson, 45 Iowa, 149. Cramer was therefore not immune from process of the lower c......
  • Ware v. Farmers' Nat. Bank of Danville
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • 26 July 1933
    ...here is not whether the Kentucky court has “power to reach out for persons and things beyond the lines of the state” (Moore v. Kraft (C. C. A.) 179 F. 685, 686), nor whether a judgment against or in favor of an executor in one state is binding upon the executor of the same estate in another......
  • Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Smoot, 8991.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 17 December 1945
    ...7 L.Ed. 164; Audas v. Highland, etc., Co., 6 Cir., 205 F. 862. 2 Christmas v. Russell, 5 Wall. 290, 72 U.S. 290, 18 L.Ed. 475; Moore v. Kraft, 7 Cir., 179 F. 685. 3 Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U.S. 351, 24 L.Ed. 4 2 App.D.C. 290. 5 10 App.D.C. 260. 6 157 Ill. 95, 41 N.E. 740, 741, 29 L.R.......
  • Schofield v. Spencer
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 30 October 1926
    ...concern John Sharp, Sr., deceased, personally, as to any contract made or specific property acquired by him during his lifetime. (Moore v. Kraft, 179 F. 685; Talmage Adm. v. Chapel, 16 Mass. 71; Fox Tay, 89 Cal. 339, 23 Am. St. 474, 26 P. 897; Bright v. Currie, 7 N.Y. S.Ct. Rep. (5 Sand.) 4......
  • Get Started for Free