Moore v. Smith
Decision Date | 10 October 1910 |
Docket Number | 1,830. |
Citation | 182 F. 540 |
Parties | MOORE v. SMITH et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
T. J Hoolan, William Scallon, and Walsh & Nolan, for appellant.
R. Lee Word and William Wallace, Jr., for appellees.
Before GILBERT and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and WOLVERTON, District Judge.
The record shows that for many years John M. Smith and William A Smith, who were brothers, were the owners of a large amount of land in the state of Montana, upon which they carried on the sheep, cattle, and horse business. At first they managed the business themselves, but in 1890 they organized a corporation under the laws of Montana, under the name of Smith Bros. Sheep Company, to which corporation they conveyed all of their property. Each of them was married, and to the wife of each was given 5,000 shares of the capital stock of the company, which amounted to 250,000 shares. The remainder of the stock was divided equally between the brothers. The wife of William A. Smith deserted him in 1891, leaving three small children-- the oldest a boy then seven years old, and two younger girls, the older of whom was the complainant in this case and is the appellant here. These children William A. Smith subsequently sent to live with their aunt, a Mrs. Reynolds, in Ohio, who was a sister of the two brothers. Napoleon B. Smith, who was their nephew, was an attorney at law residing at White Sulphur Springs, Meagher county, Mont., in which county most of the property of the brothers was situated, and in which they both resided. William A. Smith died there on February 13, 1897 and on his deathbed made his will, which was drawn by Napoleon B. Smith, by which will he left all of his estate to his three children and appointed his said nephew executor thereof.
During the course of his examination as a witness, John M. Smith was asked what, if any, request his brother William made of him in his last illness regarding his children, and answered: At the time of his death 'William A. Smith was the owner of 122,950 shares of the stock of the Smith Bros. Sheep Company-- John M. Smith then owning a majority of the stock.
The case shows that John M. Smith was himself then in poor health, as was his wife, and that in consequence he spent much of his time at Pasadena, Cal., where he was at the time of much of the correspondence hereinafter referred to. Some time after the business was incorporated one McNaught, who was a brother-in-law of John M. Smith, became manager of the property under the supervision and direction of the latter. The will of William A. Smith was admitted to probate, and Napoleon B. Smith became executor of his estate. After the death of William A. Smith, and because of the age and poor health of John M. Smith, and perhaps for other reasons, both John M. Smith and the executor became desirous of selling the whole property. A sale by John M. Smith of his majority of the stock to a stranger might have worked to the injury of the minority interest of the children of the deceased William A. Smith, so that both John M. Smith and the executor of the estate of William A. Smith became desirous that both interests be sold together. Repeated efforts in that behalf failed of accomplishment.
On the 23d of November, 1897, McNaught asked for an option of purchase, to run until the end of the year, on all of the property, free of debts, except future payments on certain railroad land contracts, on which application J. M. Smith endorsed this:
The executor of the estate of William A. Smith indorsed thereon the following:
The evidence shows that the executor regarded the estimate of John M. Smith as to the value of the property at the time too high, as did others.
On the 14th of December, 1897, John M. Smith wrote a letter from Martinsdale, Mont., to the executor, which reads in part as follows:
The record shows that on the 24th day of January, 1898, the judge of the probate court made an order based upon the application of the executor, authorizing him to sell all of the 122,950 shares of the stock of the company belonging to the estate of William A. Smith, deceased,
On the 19th of the following March, John M. Smith wrote a letter from Helena, Mont., to the executor, which is in part as follows:
'Mr. N. B. Smith Dear Nefue I wish to get the least price that you can excep for the children stalk (stock) I may have to dew some figuering to sell the Plant & in case I knawd fest how much I could drop and pay all debts it would give me a chance to handel my self what would you give me a opten on the Stock after the debts is payed I think you said the order was for you to sell for $75,000 but we think we can dew better then that I think I can get them 80 or 85000 out it clear for them now can you name enney price that would soat you to give a opchen on so I might have a maregen to mark (work) on think the matter over & let me know . . . (signed) J. M. Smith.'
On March 25th, 1898, the executor replied as follows:
'Office of N. B. Smith, County Attorney, Meagher County.
'White Sulphur Springs, Mont. March 25th, 1898.
July 2, 1898, John M. Smith wrote to the executor as follows:
'Smiths Ranch July 2 1898.
'N. B. Smith Dear Nefue
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Smith's Estate
...on substantially the same facts was reached by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, in the case of Moore v. Smith, 182 F. 540, 105 C. C. A. 78. In federal court, the action was decided in the first instance adversely to the contentions of Nellie May Moore, but on appea......
-
Smith v. Smith
... ... daughters of William A. Smith that sale was adjudged by this ... court fraudulent and was annulled as to her upon certain ... terms. Those terms and all of the numerous facts and ... circumstances of the case will be found fully stated in the ... cases entitled Moore v. Smith et al., 182 F. 540, ... 105 C.C.A. 78, and Smith v. Moore, 199 F. 689, 118 ... C.C.A. 127. It is unnecessary to repeat them here. The ... brother of that complainant (appellee here) commenced a ... similar suit in one of the courts of the state of Montana to ... have set aside, as ... ...
-
Smith v. Moore
...was the appellant, and the present appellants the appellees. The opinion of this court on that appeal will be found reported in (C.C.A.) 182 F. 540, where the facts out of which the cause arose will be fully stated, and which appeal resulted in the reversal of the then judgment of the trial......
- Smith v. Smith